SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 293

V.BHARGAVA, V.RAMASWAMI, J.C.SHAH
Commissioner Of Taxes, Assam – Appellant
Versus
Prabhat Marketing Company LTD. Gauhati – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.MAHESHVARI, NAUNIT LAL

Judgment

RAMASWAMI, J. : These appeals are brought, by special leave, from the judgement of the High Court of Assam and Nagaland, dated May 20, 1964 in Sales Tax Reference No. 1 of 1963.

2. The respondent is a registered dealer under the Assam Sales Tax Act (Act XVII of 1947). For the two periods ending September 30, 1959 and September, 30, I960, the Sales Tax Officer assessed the respondent to sales tax holding that hydrogenated oil was exempt from sales tax but the value of the containers should be assessed at Re. 1 for each container of hydrogenated oil and 2 annas for salt bag and a small mustard oil tin which are other exempted goods for the period ending September 30, 1959. For the other period ending September 30, 1960, the value of the containers of the exempted goods was estimated at Rs. 21,500. The respondent preferred appeals to the Assistant Commissioner of Taxes, but the appeals were dismissed. The respondent preferred second appeals before the Assam Board of Revenue which by its order, dated June 17, 1963 also dismissed the appeals. The respondent thereafter filed an application under S. 32 of the Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947, for reference of the following two questions o











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top