A.K.SARKAR, J.L.KAPUR, N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, K.C.DAS GUPTA, J.R.MUDHOLKAR
Shalig Ram – Appellant
Versus
Firm Daulatram Kundanmal – Respondent
Judgment
KAPUR, J. : This is an appeal on a certificate of the High Court under Article 133 (1) (c) of the Constitution against the judgment and order of the High Court of Bombay. The appellant was the judgment debtor and the decree-holder is the respondent.
2. The decree was passed on August 26. 1981, in Summary Suit No. 2437 of 1930 by the High Court of Bombay against three defendants who-were residents of Parbhani District in the former State of Hyderabad. Before the decree was passed the appellant had applied for leave to defend and leave was conditionally granted on his depositing Rs. 5,000 within four weeks. This, he did not do and on his failure to do so an ex parte decree was granted for Rs. 52,032-7-0 including costs and future interest at 6 per cent per annum. The appellant did not file any written statement. The decree was transferred for execution to the District Judge, Bhir, in Hyderabad State. The respondent took out execution on June 18, 1954, in the Court of the District Judge, Bhir, to which objection was taken by the appellant, inter alia, on the ground that he had not submitted to the jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court which was a foreign Court and, therefore, t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.