SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 183

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, V.BHARGAVA, V.RAMASWAMI
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Vinaya Chandra Chhota Lal Pathi – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.R.CHARI, B.R.G.K.Achar, H.M.CHINOY, M.V.GOSWAMY, V.S.NAYYAR

Judgment

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J. : This appeal, by special leave, is by the State of Gujarat against the order of the Gujarat High Court acquitting the respondent of the offence under S. 408 I. P C

2. The respondent was an employee of Nalinkant. P. W. 1, the sole proprietor of Arora Trading Company, in l959. He was in service from 1954. It was his duty to withdraw moneys from the Union Bank of India Ltd., with which Nalinkant had an account. Nalinkant used to leave his cheque book with a few blank signed cheques with the respondent when he had to go out of Ahmedabad, the place of business. The prosecution case is that the respondent took advantage of such blank cheques, filled them up and cashed them from the Bank and misappropriated the amounts so received. He made no entries about such receipts in the petty cash book maintained by the firm.

3. Nalinkant was the only witness to prove that the relevant entries in the cheques and the signatures at the back of the cheques in token of having received the amounts from the Bank were of the respondent Corroboration of his statement was sought from four documents two of which were documents said to have been handed over to Nalinkant by the respon




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top