SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 319

J.M.SHELAT, K.N.WANCHOO, R.S.BACHAWAT
Kumara Nand – Appellant
Versus
Brijmohan Lal Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
B.D.SHARMA, D.P.Singh, L.D.SHARMA, R.K.GARG, RAMAMURTHI, S.C.AGRAWAL

Judgment

WANCHOO, J. : This is an appeal on a, certificate granted by the Rajasthan High Court and arises in the following circumstances. There was an election to the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly from the Beawar constituency at the general election in 1962. A number of persons stood for election, two of whom were the appellant and the respondent. The appellant secured the highest number of votes while the respondent came second. The appellant was declared successful at the election and this led to an election petition by the respondent.

2. A number of grounds were taken in the election petition for invalidating the election of the appellant, but in the present appeal we are concerned with one ground and shall refer to that only. That ground was that the appellant had committed a corrupt practice as defined in Section 123 (4) of the Representation of the People Act, No. 43 of 1951, (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The case of the respondent was that the appellant had published a statement of fact in relation to the respondent s personal character or conduct and that statement of fact was false, and the appellant either believed it to be false or did not believe it to be true. T






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top