SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 298

J.C.SHAH, V.BHARGAVA, V.RAMASWAMI
George Da Costa – Appellant
Versus
Controller Of Estate Duty Mysore – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, K.SRINIVASAN INDRAJEETH SHAH, R.GOPAL KRISHNAN, R.N.SACH, T.A.Ramachandran

Judgment

RAMASWANI, J. : This appeal is brought, by special leave, from the judgment of the. Mysore High Court s dated November 17, 1964 in Tax Referred Case No. 1 of 1964.

2. The property in question is house No. 34 Mahatma Gandhi Road, Bangalore. It had been purchased by the appellant s father Dr. C. F. Da Costa (hereinafter called the deceased ) in the joint names of himself and his wife on February 14, 1940. They made a gift of the house to their two sons on October 29, 1954. The document recites that the donees had accepted the gift and they had been put in possession. But the parents continued to be in possession of the house though the municipal tax was paid thereafter in the names of the sons. The deceased died on September 30, 1959 more than 4 years after the gift. The appellant, the accountable person, then filed a return showing the value of the estate left by his father at Rs. 93,750 excluding the value of the house No. 34, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Bangalore. The Assistant Controller of Estate Duty, however, included the sum of Rs. 1,50,000 as the value thereof and determined the aggregate value of the estate at Rs. 2,57,249 and assessed the estate duty payable at Rs. 15,751




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top