SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 286

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.C. SHAH AND V. RAMASWAMI, JJ.
The Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras (In all the Appeals), Appellant
Versus
Prithvi Insurance Co. Ltd. (In all the Appeals), Respondent.
Civil Appeals Nos. 729 to 732 of 1965, dated 26-10-1966.
Advocates appeared
Mr. R. M. Hazarnavis, (M/s. Gopal Singh and R.N. Sachthey, Advocates, with him), for Appellant (In all the Appeals); M/s. S. Swaminathan and M. S. Narasimhan, Advocates , for Respondent (In all the Appeals).

Advocates:
Gopal Singh, M.S.NARASIMHAN, R.M.Hajarnavis, R.N.SACH, S.SWAMINATHAN

Life insurance business and general insurance business carried on by the same assessee constitute the same business within the meaning of S. 24 (2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

Headnote:

INCOME TAX - Loss in life insurance business - Whether can be set off against profit in general insurance business - Same business - Meaning of - S. 24 (2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, a public limited company, carried on life and general insurance business. In the assessment year 1951-52, the Income-tax Officer held that the life insurance business and the general insurance business carried on by the Company were "distinct and separate" and the loss carried forward from the previous year in respect of life insurance business could not be set off under S. 24 (2) against the profit of the general insurance business.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court answered the question in the affirmative.

Issues: Whether the unabsorbed losses incurred by the assessee in the earlier years in its life insurance business are available to be set off against its profits from general insurance business for the assessment years 1951-52 to 1954-55?

Ratio Decidendi: The two businesses constituted one composite business: the Company was entitled to carry on the life insurance business and the general insurance business under its Memorandum of Association, and the businesses were attended to by the Branch Managers and the Agents without any distinction, there was one common administrative organization and the expenses incurred in connection with the business both for administration and for heads of expenditure such as salary of the staff, postage, staff welfare fund and general charges, were common.

Final Decision: The appeals therefore fail and are dismissed with costs.

Judgment

SHAH, J. : The respondent, a public limited company, carried on in the relevant years of account business of insurance - life and general. In each of the calendar years 1944 to 1948 relating to the assessment years 1945-46 to 1950-51, the Company suffered doss in the life insurance section and made profit in the general insurance section. Till the assessment year 1950-51 the loss suffered in the life insurance section was allowed by the Revenue authorities to be carried forward and set off under S 24 (2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, against profits from the general insurance section in the subsequent year. In proceedings for assessment for the assessment year 1951-52 the Income tax Officer held that the life insurance business and the general insurance business carried on by the Company were "distinct and separate" and the loss carried forward from the previous year in respect of life insurance business could not be set off under S. 24 (2) against the profit of the general insurance business. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal confirmed the view of the Income-tax Officer. The Tribunal referred the following question to the High Court of Madras under S. 66 (1) of the Income-tax Act :

"Whether the unabsorbed losses incurred by the assessee in the earlier years in its life insurance business are available to be set off against its profits from general insurance business for the assessment years 1951-52 to 1954-55?"

The High Court answered the question in the affirmative. With certificate granted by the High Court, these appeals have been preferred by the Commissioner of Income-tax.

2. The order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal summarises the reasons which persuaded the Departmental authorities to reject the claim of the Company. The Tribunal states :

"The business of life insurance possesses peculiar characteristics which do not exist in respect of other insurance business. Firstly the life insurance policies are not contracts of indemnity. Secondly , the contract in the general insurance is generally annual, while in the case of life business the risk continues until death. Unlike general insurance contracts, the life contract, is made once and for all. The General insurance "contracts , are in law, fresh contracts entered into at the time of each renewal. Thirdly, life business is controlled by principles essentially variant from those which control the general insurance business. Fourthly, the life premia do not represent the life profits in one year be set off as a deduction. Fifthly, the law under which life business in carried on is quite different from the laws governing general business; and lastly , assessable profits of life business shall be computed separately from those of the general business, the consequence of which would be that the carry forward of loss of life business cannot be had against the profit of general business."

3. Tax payable by an assessee under the head "Profits and gains of business, profession or vocation" is normally computed under S.10(1) of the Income -tax Act, 1922, after making allowance mentioned in sub-s. (2) of S.10. But sub-s.(7) of S.10 provides that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Ss.8,9,10,12 or 18 of the Act, the profits and gains of any business of insurance and the tax payable thereon shall be computed in accordance with the rules contained in the Schedule to the Act. The Schedule is headed "Rules for the computation of the Profits and Gains of Insurance Business". By R. 1 it is provided that in the case of any person who carries on, or at any time in the preceding year carried on life insurance business the profits and gains of such person from that business shall be computed separately from his income, profits or gains from any other business. By R. 2 it is provided :

The profits and gains of life insurance shall he taken to be either -

(a) the gross external incomings of the preceding year from that business less the manageme


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top