SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 172

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, V.BHARGAVA, V.RAMASWAMI
Shivanarayan Kabra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madras – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.RANGAM, NAUNIT LAL

Judgment

RAMASWAMI, J. : This appeal is brought, by special leave, from the judgment of the Madras High Court, dated July 16, 1863 in Criminal Revision Case No. 1139 1961

2. The appellant was charged for having committed offences under S. 420, Indian Penal Code and S. 21 (d) and (e) of the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 (Act 74 of 1952), hereinafter called the "Act", with regard to certain transaction his between the appellant and P. W. 2, Rajam. The appellant was convicted of all the charges and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs. 1,000 under S. 420, Indian Penal Code and a fine of Rs. 100 under each of Cls. (d) and (e) of S. 21 of the Act by the District Magistrate Kumbakonam. He further directed that a sum of Rs. 1,000 out of the said fine should be paid to P. W. 2. On appeal, the convictions and sentences were affirmed by the Sessions Judge, West Thanjavur. The appellant took the matter in revision to the Madras High Court but the revision application was dismissed

3. The appellant was the proprietor of a firm in Bombay known as "Jawarmal Gulab Chand". He advertised that people could invest capital in cotton, oil seeds and other commodit































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top