SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 28

K.N.WANCHOO, V.RAMASWAMI
I. N. Saksena – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, I.M.SHROFF, M.N.SHROFF, Mahinder Narain, RAJINDAR NARAIN, RAMESHWAR NATH ROY

Judgement

WANCHOO, J. : This is an appeal on a certificate granted by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh and arises in the following circumstances. The appellant was in the service of the State of Madhya Pradesh as a District and Sessions Judge. He was born on August 22, 1908 and would in the normal course have retired on completing the age of 55 years in August 1963. But on February 28, 1963, the Government of Madhya Pradesh issued a memorandum to all the Collectors in the State. Copy of this memorandum was also sent to the Registrar, High Court as well as the Finance Department and the Accountant-General. The relevant part of this memorandum is as follows:-

"The State Government have decided that the age of compulsory retirement of State Government s servants should be raised to 58 years subject to the following exceptions .. . . .........

2. * * * *

3. * * * *

4. * * * *

5. Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing paragraphs, the appointing authority may require a Government servant to retire after he attains the age of 55 years on three months notice without assigning any reason.... . the power will normally be exercised to weed out unsuitable employees after they have attai



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top