1. Challenge to assessment orders under the Punjab General Sales-tax Act 1948 regarding purchase tax on cotton and its consistency with the Central Sales-tax Act 1956. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 )
Back
Next 
1967 Supreme(SC) 126
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. SUBBA RAO, C.J.I., J.C. SHAH, S.M. SIKRI, V. RAMASWAMI AND C.A. VAIDIALINGAM, JJ.
M/s. Bhawani Cotton Mills Ltd., Appellant (In all the Appeals)
Versus
State of Punjab and another, Respondents (In all the Appeals).
Civil Appeals Nos. 2386 to 2388 of 1966,
D/- 10-4-1967.
Advocates appeared
Mr. S. T. Desai Senior Advocate, (M/s. A. N: Sinha, C. D. Garg and B. P. Jha, Advocates, with him), for Appellant (In C. A. No. 2386 of 1966), Mr. H. E. Shibal, Senior Advocate, (M/s. A. N. Sinha, C. D. Garg and B. P. Jha, Advocates, with him), for Appellant (In C. As. Nos. 2387 and 2388 of 1966); Mr. Bishan Narain, Senior Advocate, (M/s. O. P. Malhotra and R. N. Sachthey, Advocates, with him), for Respondents (In all the Appeals).
Advocates:
A.N.SINHA, B.P.JHA, BISHAN NARAIN, C.D.GARG, H.L.SIBAL, O.P.MALHOTRA, R.N.SACH, S.T.DESAI
A.N.SINHA, B.P.JHA, BISHAN NARAIN, C.D.GARG, H.L.SIBAL, O.P.MALHOTRA, R.N.SACH, S.T.DESAI
A state sales tax on declared goods must be levied at a single, clearly defined stage to comply with the Central Sales-tax Act; refund provisions cannot validate a multi-stage levy. Tax rate notifications must also be consistent with the current statutory definition of the taxable event.
Headnote:(A) State Sales-tax Act - Sections 2(ff), 4, 5(1), 5(2)(a)(vi), 12 - Central Sales-tax Act - Section 15(a) - Purchase tax on declared goods - One stage taxation - A tax on declared goods must be levied at only one stage as per the Central Act. The absence of a clear provision or machinery in the State Act or rules to identify the specific stage of taxation makes the levy violative of the Central Act. A provision for refund does not cure the illegality of a levy imposed at multiple stages or on persons not liable to tax, as there is a broad distinction between exemptions/refunds and total non-liability to tax. (Paras 18-22)
(B) State Sales-tax Act - Section 5(1) - Notification for rate of tax - Amendment of definition of 'purchase' - When the definition of 'purchase' is amended, a notification fixing the rate of tax based on the previous definition cannot be applied to the new definition if they are inconsistent. In the absence of a fresh notification under the amended definition, no assessment can be made for the intervening period. (Paras 24-29)
Facts of the case:
A dealer engaged in cotton ginning and yarn manufacturing challenged assessment orders for three assessment years, contending that the purchase tax on cotton under the State Act was opposed to the Central Act, specifically the mandate that tax on declared goods be levied at only one stage. The appellant further challenged the validity of assessments for two of those years on the ground that the notification fixing the rate of tax was not issued until after the definition of 'purchase' had been amended in the State Act.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the State Act failed to prescribe a single point for taxation, creating a risk where multiple persons could be made liable for tax on the same commodity. It was held that the refund provisions were inadequate to remedy this. Regarding the notification, the court found the 1958 notification inconsistent with the 1960 amended definition of 'purchase,' rendering assessments prior to the September 1961 notification unsustainable.
Issues: Whether the State Act's purchase tax provisions on declared goods violate the 'one stage' mandate of the Central Act, and whether assessments are valid when the tax rate notification is issued after an amendment to the definition of the taxable event.
Ratio Decidendi: For declared goods, tax can only be levied at a single point; no legal liability for payment of tax accrues unless the Act or rules prescribe a single point for taxation. A refund mechanism is not a substitute for a valid one-stage levy because non-liability to tax excludes the transaction from the calculation of turnover altogether. Furthermore, a notification for tax rates must be consistent with the current statutory definition of the taxable event to be valid.
Result: Appeals allowed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
- taxation
- administrative law
Table of Contents
2. Whether purchase tax on declared goods is levied at more than one stage and whether tax notifications were validly issued following statutory amendments. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 27 , 28 )
3. Absence of a prescribed single point of taxation violates the Central Act; refund provisions cannot validate an illegal multi-stage levy; notifications must align with current statutory definitions. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 28 , 29 )
4. Tax on declared goods must be levied at a single point; refund mechanisms do not cure the lack of a defined single-stage taxation point. (Para 19 , 21 , 22 )
5. Appeals allowed; assessment orders set aside. (Para 30 , 38 )
6. Does a state sales tax law violate the Central Sales-tax Act if it lacks a defined single point of taxation for declared goods?
Yes. Section 15(a) of the Central Act mandates that tax on declared goods be levied at only one stage. Without a clear provision or rule prescribing a single point for taxation, the levy is illegal, as it creates a risk of multi-stage taxation. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 )
7. Can a refund provision in a state tax law cure the illegality of taxing a person who is not liable to tax?
No. There is a broad distinction between exemptions or refunds and total non-liability. If a person is not liable to tax, the tax cannot be collected in the first instance and then refunded; the non-liability excludes them from the taxable turnover entirely. (Para 21 , 22 )
8. Is a tax notification issued under an old statutory definition valid after the definition of the taxable event is amended?
No. If the amended statutory definition is inconsistent with the one used for the original notification, a fresh notification must be issued to sustain the levy under the new definition. A notification based on an obsolete definition cannot support assessments. (Para 28 , 29 )
Judgment
VAIDIALINGAM, J. : (On behalf of himself, Subba Rao CJI. and Shah J.): In all these three appeals on certificate, the common judgment of the High Court of Punjab, dismissing the three writ petitions filed by the appellant, is under attack, by Mr. S. T. Desai, learned counsel for the appellant.
2. The appellant, who is the same in all these appeals, is the Bhawani Cotton Mills Ltd., running a cotton ginning factory, and engaged in the business of manufacturing yarn from cotton. It is a dealer, registered under the Punjab General Sales-tax Act 1948 (Punjab Act. No. XL VI of 1948), hereinafter called the Act. The appellant filed returns for the assessment years 1360-61, 1961-62 and 1962-63. It had paid a certain amount of tax which, according to it, was alone due from it. But, according to the appellant, it was not liable to pay Central Sales-tax on the purchase of cotton during the relevant accounting years. The appellant had taken various grounds of attack, before the assessing authority, but the most important contention raised, appears to have been that the material provisions in the Act, particularly the second proviso to S. 5 (1) and Cl. (vi)of S. 5 (2) (a) of the Act. enabling the State to collect purchase tax, in respect of cotton, are opposed to the material provisions of the Central Sales-tax Act l956 (Act LXXIV of 1956) (hereinafter called the Central Act). The appellant pleaded that it was not liable to pay, in consequence, any purchase tax, for the assessment years in question, in respect of cotton.
3. The Excise and Taxation Officer ,Ferozepore, did not accept the plea of the petitioner-appellant regarding its non-liability to pay the purchase tax on cotton. He, accordingly, passed orders of assessment including the turnover representing the purchases of cotton made by the appellant. The assessment orders for the years 1960-61 and 1961-62, are dated November 15, 1962, and for the assessment year 1962-63, is dated July.30,1963.
4. The appellant, thereupon, filed Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 1913 and 1914 of 1962 and 1591 of 1963, challenging the assessment orders for the years l961-62 and l960-61 and 1962-63, respectively. The High Court, by its common order, rejected the writ petitions filed by the appellant and confirmed the orders of assessment, passed by the assessing authority.
5. The common question, that arises for consideration on in these three appeals, is as to whether the second proviso to S. 5 (l) Cl (vi) of S. 5 (2) (a) of the Act, are opposed to any of the relevant provisions of the Central Act. A further question arises in Civil Appeals Nos. 2387 and 2388 of l966, regarding the validity of a Notification, issued by the State Government, under S. 5 of the Act, on September 26. 1961. We shall consider this further question, after expressing our opinion, on the more important question which is common to 211 the appeals.
6. In order to appreciate the contentions that have been taken before us, by Mr. S. T. Desai, learned counsel for the appellant, and Mr. Bishan Narain, learned counsel for the State, it is necessary to refer to the relevant provisions in both the Acts. It is only necessary to refer to the provisions of the Act, as they stood on April 1, 1960. The Act of 1948, has been amended from time to time, and it may not be necessary to refer to those amendments, excepting on one aspect, when we deal with the validity of the Notification, referred to earlier.
7. Coming to the Act, according to its preamble it is an Act to provide for the levy of a general tax on the sale or purchase of goods in Punjab. The expressions dealer goods , prescribed , purchase . sale turnover and year are defined in Cs. (d) (e), (f), (ff), (h), (i) and (j) of S. 2. Particularly, S. 2 (ff), defining purchase , is as follows:
"2 (ff). In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,-
purchase with all its grammatical or cognate expressions, means the acquisition of goods specified in Schedu
