SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 123

V.RAMASWAMI, J.C.SHAH, S.M.SIKRI
Sales Tax Officer, Ponkunnam – Appellant
Versus
K. I. Abraham – Respondent


Advocates:
B.R.L.Iyengar, M.R.Krishna Pillai

Judgment

RAMASWAMI, J. : This appeal is brought, by special leave, from the judgment of the High Court of Kerala dated November 29, 1963 in Writ Petition, O. P. No. 2165 of 1962.

2. The respondent (hereinafter called the assesses ) was a dealer in Cocoanut oil business having inter-State sales. For the year 1959-60 the assessee was assessed to sales tax under S. 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act (Act 74 of 1956), hereinafter called the Act . Out of a total turnover of Rs. 2,30,990 and odd determined by the Sales Tax Officer, only a sum of Rs. 1,89,734 and odd was supported by proper declaration Form C . Tax was therefore imposed by the Sales Tax Officer at the rate of 1 per cent on the turnover of Rs. 1,93,346 and at 7 per cent on the balance namely. Rs. 37,645. The assessee did not file the declaration forms on or before the prescribed date, i. e., February 16, l961 but he actually filed the declaration forms on March 8, 1961 before the order of assessment was made, the delay being explained as due to late receipt of the declaration forms from the purchaser in Madras The assessee preferred an appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner but the appeal was dismissed. The assessee t



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top