SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 73

R.S.BACHAWAT, V.RAMASWAMI, K.N.WANCHOO
Sital Parshad – Appellant
Versus
Kishori Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
A.D.MATHUR, B.C.MISHRA, M.V.GOSWAMY, Rameshwar Dayal, S.S.SHUKLA

Judgment

WANCHOO, J. : This is an appeal on a certificate granted by the High Court of Punjab and raises a question of law on which there is some different of opinion amongest the High Courts. Brief facts necessary for present purpose are these. The respondent obtained a preliminary decree in a mortgage suit against the appellants on March 13, 1952. The decree was for sale of the mortgaged property . As the prelimnary decree did not allow interest to the respondent from the date of the suit to the date of the preliminary decree, he filed an appeal to the High Court in that connection. The appellants (Judgment-debtors) were apparently content with the preliminary decree for they filed no appeal. As there was no stay order passed by the High court, for, the judgment-detors had not appealed, the respondent applied for making the preliminary decree final and on August 16, 1954 the preliminary decree was made final under O. XXXIV R. 5 of Code of Civil Procedure On August 18, 1954, the respondent took out execution of the final decree . On December 17, 1956, while the execution proceedings were pending, the respondent decreeholder s appeal in the High Court was allowed and the High Court






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top