SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 83

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, M.HIDAYATULLAH, S.M.SIKRI
Orient Paper Mills LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.MAHESHVARI, B.SEN, BISHAN NARAIN, R.N.SACH, S.G.PATVARDHAN, S.P.NAIR, S.V.Gupta

Judgment

HIDAYATULLAH, J. : The appellant is a public limited company which carries on the business of manufacturing and selling wholesale paper and boards at Brajrajnagar in the State of Orissa. The appellant company holds a licence under the Central Excise Act in Form L-4 prescribed by the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The appellant company s factory and its premises and precincts have been demarcated under the said Rules. The Factory is traversed by railway lines, because the appellant company enjoys the benefit of a private siding. In 1960, the appellant Company constructed a new railway siding outside the original factory premises where bamboos and other raw materials were stored and constructed a platform for loading and unloading .This extension has not been included in the factory or its premises or precints for purposes of the Excise Rules. It is presumably so, because to reach the new siding, a public road has to be traversed which is not enclosed and from which public cannot be excluded. It is in evidence that after this new siding was constructed, the appellant company requested the excise authorities to amend the licence to include the new railway siding but this was refu



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top