SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 237

S.M.SIKRI, J.C.SHAH, J.M.SHELAT
M. Gopalkrishna Naidu – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, E.C.AGARWAL, I.M.SHROFF, M.N.SHROFF, P.C.AGRAWAL, R.V.S.Mani

Judgement

SHELAT, J. :- Prior to December 17, 1947 the appellant was serving as an Overseer in the Public Works Department of the Central Provinces and Berar Government. On December 17, 1947 he was suspended from service and prosecuted under Section 161 of the Penal Code. The trial resulted in his conviction but that was set aside in appeal on the ground that no proper sanction for prosecution was obtained. He was again prosecuted on the same charge but the Special Judge trying him quashed the charge-sheet on the ground that the investigation had not been carried out by the proper authorities. In revision the High Court of Nagpur held that the Special Judge was in error in so holding but recommended that the prosecution should not be proceeded with as nearly 10 years had gone by since it was launched against the appellant. Following the recommendation the prosecution was dropped, but a departmental inquiry was held on the same charges. The Inquiry Officer found the appellant not guilty but the Government disagreed with that finding and served a notice to show cause why he should not be dismissed. By an order dated December 5, 1960 the Government held that the charges against the app























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top