SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 196

J.C.SHAH, S.M.SIKRI, V.RAMASWAMI
Vith Income Tax Officer, City Circle Ii, Bangalore – Appellant
Versus
K. Y. Pillaiah And Sons – Respondent


Advocates:
R.Ganapathy Iyer, R.GOPAL KRISHNAN, R.N.SACH, S.P.NAIR, Veda Vyasa

Judgement

SHAH, J. : The respondents - a Hindu undivided family - were assessed for the assessment year 1949-50 to tax under S. 23 of the Mysore Income-tax Act on a total income of Rs. 10,100/-. The Second Additional Income-tax Officer (Urban Circle) Bangalore, commenced a proceeding under S. 34 of the Mysore Income-tax Act for reassessment of the income of the respondent for the assessment year 1949-50, and served a notice in that behalf on March 6, 1951. On May 21, 1954 the Income-tax Officer determined the respondents total income at Rs. 75,957/-. In appeal against the order the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, A Range, Bangalore, by order dated November 4, 1961, set aside the order and directed the Income-tax Officer to make a fresh assessment after making inquiries on certain matters specified in the order.

2. At the request of the respondent under S. 66 (2) Of the Mysore Income-tax Act, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Mysore, referred the following questions to the High Court of Mysore :

"1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the assessee s case whether within the meaning of S. 94 of the Mysore Incometax Act, if a notice under that section is issued withi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top