SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 228

M.HIDAYATULLAH, C.A.VAIDIALINGAM
Central Bank Of India LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Karunamoy Banerjee – Respondent


Advocates:
C.L.CHOPRA, CO., H.R.GOKHALE, J.B.DADACHAN, JANARDAN SHARMA, O.C.MATHUR, P.C.BHARTARI

Judgement

VAIDIALINGAM, J. : This appeal, by special leave, by the appellant Bank, is directed against the order, dated May 13, 1964, of the Central Labour Court, Dhanbad, rejecting as, application, filed by the Bank, under Section 33 (2) (b), of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947) (hereinafter called the Act), and declining to grant approval of the action taken, by the Bank, by way of discharging the respondent-workman, from the Bank s services.

2. The respondent was, at the material time, the Assistant Accountant, at the main Office of the Bank, at Calcutta. In view of certain serious irregularities noticed by the Bank, in respect of the work of the respondent in the Current Accounts Department and, in particular, in current account ledgers Nos. 4 and 6, by order dated March 8, 1961, the respondent was suspended, with immediate effect. He was also informed that the charges against him would be communicated, is due course.

3. By a further communication, dated March 13/14, 1961, the respondent was required to offer his explanation in respect of four allegations made in the said communication. The main allegations were that, in respect of ledger accounts Nos. 4 and 6, s





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top