SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 290

J.C.SHAH, J.M.SHELAT, S.M.SIKRI
Sita Ram – Appellant
Versus
Radha Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
A.G.Ratnaparkhi, J.P.GOYAL, SOBHAG MAL JAIN, W.S.Barlingay

Judgement

SHAH, J. : Lachmi Narain father of Sita Ram appellant in this appeal - was the brother of Radhahai - respondent herein. On April 15, 1942. Radhabai - who will hereinafter be called the plaintiff entrusted gold pearl and diamond jewellery of the value of Rs. 32,379-6-0 to Lachhmi Narain for safe custody. After the death of Lachhmi Narain in July 1943, the appellant was called upon by the plaintiff to return that jewellery. The appellant replied that Lachhmi Narain had during his life time returned the jewellery to the plaintiff. The plaintiff then instituted an action against Sita Ram, his son Ghanshyam and other members of the family, in the Court of the First Civil Judge, Kanpur, for a decree ordering delivery of the jewellery or for payment of its value. The Trial Court dismissed the action upholding the case of the appellant that the jewellery was returned to the plaintiff by Lachhmi Narain on April 23, 1942. In appeal, the High Court of Allahabad reversed the decree passed by the Trial Court and passed a decree directing that the jewellery be restored to the plaintiff within one month from the date of the decree, and in the event of failure to comply with that direct































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top