J.M.SHELAT, K.S.HEGDE, S.M.SIKRI
Mangulal Chunilal – Appellant
Versus
Manilal Maganlal – Respondent
Judgement
SIKRI, J.: This appeal by certificate granted by the High Court of Gujarat is directed against the judgment and order of the said High Court in Cri. Revn. Application No. 145 of 1984 whereby the High Court allowed the application and set aside the conviction and sentence of Manilal Maganlal, one of the respondents before us. The only point involved in this appeal is whether the licence inspector, Mangulal Chunilal, was competent to file the complaint under S. 376(1)(d)(i), read with S. 392(1)(a), of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, hereinafter referred to as the Act.
2. The relevant facts are not now in dispute and are as follows : On October 10, l963, Mangulal Chunilal, licence inspector, filed a complaint against Manilal Maganlal, hereinafter referred to as the accused, alleging that the accused had carried on the work of blacksmith by manufacturing machinery, spare parts and the safe cupboards, without obtaining licence. At the end of the complaint it was stated:
"I have obtained permission for filing this complaint from the Medical Officer of Health by order No. dated 1st October, 1963."
The licence inspector had applied to the Deputy Health Officer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.