SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 371

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, M.HIDAYATULLAH
Haroom Haji Abdulla – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
CHAMPAT RAI, E.C.AGARWAL, H.R.KHANNA, Nuruddin Ahmed, P.C.AGRAWAL, P.GANDHI, S.P.NAIR, S.V.PIKALE

Judgement

HIDAYATULLAH, J .:- The appellant Haroom is the sole appellant from a batch of 18 persons who were tried jointly before the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Esplanade Court, Bombay for offences under S. 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 167(81) of the Sea Customs Act and certain offences under the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1947. Of these, No. 17 accused (Saleh Mohamed Bhaya) was discharged by the Magistrate, No. 1 accused (Govind Narain Bengali) died after the conclusion of the case but before judgment in the Court of trial and No. 4 accused (Noor Mohammad) jumped bail just before the same judgment. The case against Bengali was held to have abated and that against Noor Mohammad was kept pending. Nos. 11, 12, 13 and 16 accused were acquitted. Of the remaining accused who were convicted, Haroom alone is before us. His appeal to the High Court of Bombay was dismissed but he obtained special leave under Art. 136 of the Constitution and brought this appeal.

2. As this appeal is to be considered on a question of law, it is not necessary to give the facts in detail. The several accused (and many others unknown) were said to be concerned in a criminal conspiracy


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top