SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 367

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, M.HIDAYATULLAH
Laxmipat Choraria – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, B.A.PANDA, B.PARTHASARTHY, H.R.KHANNA, J.B.DADACHAN, K.G.KHANDALAVALA, KUMAR MEHTA

Judgement Key Points

Question 1? What is the admissibility of accomplice testimony (Ethyl Wong) and the use of photostats in proving conspiracy under sections referenced? Question 2? What is the proper interpretation of the term "accused" in the exclusionary clause of the Indian Oaths Act, 5, and its relation to Section 132 of the Indian Evidence Act? Question 3? What are the conditions under which photostat handwriting evidence can be admitted when originals are unavailable, and how does this affect conspiracy prosecutions?

Key Points: - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!)

Question 1?

What is the admissibility of accomplice testimony (Ethyl Wong) and the use of photostats in proving conspiracy under sections referenced?

Question 2?

What is the proper interpretation of the term "accused" in the exclusionary clause of the Indian Oaths Act, 5, and its relation to Section 132 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Question 3?

What are the conditions under which photostat handwriting evidence can be admitted when originals are unavailable, and how does this affect conspiracy prosecutions?


Judgement

HIDAYATULLAH, J.: - The appellants who are three brothers appeal by certificate against their conviction under S. 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and S. 167 (81) of the Sea Customs Act and the sentences of imprisonment and fine respectively imposed on them. A fourth brother had filed Criminal Appeal No 55 of 1964 but did not press it at the hearing. One other person (S. L. Daga) was also convicted with them but has not appealed. These persons were found to have entered into a criminal conspiracy among themselves and with others including one Yau Mockchi, a Chinese citizen in Hong Kong, to smuggle gold into India. The method adopted was to insert strips of gold (about 250 tolas) under the lining of the lid of a suitcase, which could be retrieved by unscrewing the metal corner supports and pulling on strings attached to the strips. The suitcases were brought into India by air stewardesses, and Ethyl Wong (P. W. 1), an anglo-chinese girl employed by Air India, was one of them. Discovery came, after gold was successfully smuggled on many occasions, when Yau Mockchi approached one Sophia Wong of the B. O. A. C., line. She was engaged to a police officer and informed her superior




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top