SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 40

V.RAMASWAMI, J.C.SHAH
Puttrangamma – Appellant
Versus
M. S. Ranganna – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, H.R.GOKHALE, K.R.CHAUDHARY, K.RAJENDRA CHAUDHARY, R.GOPAL KRISHNAN

Judgement

RAMASWAMI. J. :- This appeal is brought by certificate from the judgment of the Mysore High Court dated December 5, 1960 in R. A No. 81 of 1956.

2. The appellants and respondent No. 4 are the daughters and legal representatives of Savoy Ranganna who was the plaintiff in O. S. 34 of 1950-51 instituted in the court of the District Judge, Mysore. The suit was filed by the deceased plaintiff for partition of his share in the properties mentioned in the schedule to the plaint and for granting him separate possession of the same. Respondent No. 1 is the brother s son of the plaintiff. The relationship of the parties would appear from the following pedigree :

The case of the plaintiff was that he and the defendants lived together as members of a Joint Hindu family till January 7 1951, plaintiff being the karta. The plaintiff had no male issue but had only four daughters, Chikka Rangamma. Putta Rangamma, Rangathayamma and Chinnathayamma. The first 2 daughters were widows. The fourth daughter Chinnathayamma was living with her husband. Except Chinnathayamma, the other daughters with their families had been living with the joint family. The plaintiff became ill and entered Sharda Nu






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top