SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 159

G.K.MITTER, J.C.SHAH
Godhara Borough Municipality, Godhara – Appellant
Versus
Godhra Electricity Company LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
I.M.SHROFF, PURSHOTTAM TRIKAMDAS, S.S.SHUKLA

Judgement

MITTER, J. : These are two appeals by special leave against the judgment and order dated January 8, 1963 of the Gujarat High Court dismissing Civil Revision Applications 116 and 117 of 1961filed by the appellant and allowing similar applications Nos. 173 and 174 of 1961 filed by the respondent against the common judgment dated December 1 , 1960 passed by the District and Sessions Judge of Panchmahals.

2. The matter arises out of assessments made by the appellant constituted under the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925, on the respondent under Section 73 of the Act. The respondents are an electricity company owning inter alia properties bearing several numbers in the municipal borough of Godhara. For the years 1956-57 and 1957-58 the appellant had fixed the valuation of the properties belonging to the respondent, at Rs.3,25,000. On appeal by the respondent, the Judicial Magistrate fixed the valuation of the properties at Rs. 90,000. On the appellant going in revision, the Sessions Judge fixed the valuation at Rs. 1,25,000. As a result of the High Court s decision the valuation stood reduced to Rs. 90,000. The present appeals are by the Municipality.

3. Under Sec. 73 (1) of t






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top