SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 30

K.S.HEGDE, R.S.BACHAWAT, S.M.SIKRI
Dalchand Jain – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Shankar Trivedi – Respondent


Judgment

BACHAWAT, J.- This appeal is directed against a judgment of a single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court setting aside the election of the appellant to the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly from the Sagar City constituency.

2. At the last general election to the Legislative Assembly from the Sagar City Constituency there were six contesting candidates. The appellant, the Congress candidate, secured 17,068 votes, respondent No. 1, the P.S.P. candidate secured 12, 193 votes, four other candidates secured much lesser number of votes. The appellant was declared elected. Respondent No. 1 filed an election petition and alleged a number of corrupt practices on the part of the appellant. The High Court found that the corrupt practice under Section 123(4) was proved and set aside the election. The High Court found that the other charges were not proved.

3. The charges against the appellant under Section 123(4) is that with his consent statements of facts which were false and which the appellant did not believe to be true in relation to the personal character or conduct of respondent No. 2 calculated to prejudice the prospects of his election were published in Hindi in the issues
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top