SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 165

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.C. SHAH AND V. BHARGAVA, JJ.
Kuchwar Lime and Stone Co. (in both the Appeals), Appellant
Versus
M/s. Dehri Rohtas Light Railway and Co. Ltd., and another (in both the Appeals), Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 987 and 988 of 1965,
D/- 15-7-1968.
Advocates Appeared
Mr. S. V. Gupte, Senior Advocate, (Mr. P.K.Chatterjee, Advocate, with him), for Appellant (in both the Appeals); Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, Advocate, for Respondent No. 1; Mr. K. K. Sinha, Advocate, for Respondent No. 2 (in both the Appeals).

Advocates:
K.K.SINHA, P.K.CHATTERJI, R.GOPAL KRISHNAN, S.V.Gupta

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 133 (1) (c) - Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 81, 108 and 108(2) - Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Bihar Coal Control Order, 1947 - Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Section 56 – Consignment - Declined to Accept Consignment - Sale of Coal - Charges for Demurrage and Freight – Railway filed an action against Colliery and Company in Court for a decree for Rs. being charges for demurrage and freight payable in respect of consignment less Rs. 1,050 realised from sale of coal - Held, Railway apparently made a claim of demurrage or detention of wagons for 202 days on footing that coal was not unloaded from wagons until it was sold by public auction - It was, however, duty of Railway to minimise loss by unloading coal after expiry of a reasonable period after arrival of consignment and to take early steps to sell coal - Company had given intimation that it will not take delivery of goods and therefore it was duty of Railway to sell goods by public auction without delay – Court is of view that Railway having regard to all circumstances, is entitled to demurrage for detention of wagons for one month only - On that footing Railway is entitled to Rs. 2,700 as demurrage and Rs. 495-14-0 which is payable by Company as freight, less Rs, 1,050 realised by sale of coal - Railway is accordingly entitled to a decree for Rs. 2,145/14/ - Court accordingly modify decree passed by High Court and decree claim of Railway for Rs. 2,145/14 with proportionate costs throughout - Railway will pay costs of Company proportionate to amount for which its claim has been dismissed in all three Courts - Order passed by Trial Court in favour of Colliery directing Railway to pay costs is maintained - Decree modified.

Judgement

SHAH, J.: The East Keshalpur Colliery-hereinafter called the Colliery booked, in the months of July-August 1954, a consignment of steam coal at the Kusunda railway station on the Eastern Railway for carriage by rail to the Banjari station on the Dehri Rohtas Light Railway. The coal was consigned to the Kuchwar Lime and Stone Company -hereinafter called the Company - and the company was to pay the freight. Out of the five wagons in which the coal was loaded three reached Banjari and coal was delivered to the Company, and no dispute arises with regard to those three wagons in these appeals. The contents of the remaining two wagons weighing 60 tons were re-loaded en route into six smaller wagons of the Dehri Rohtas Light Railway-hereinafter called the Railway . The consignment reached Banjari railway station on November 12, 1954. The Company declined to accept the consignment. There was thereafter correspondence between the Railway Administration, the Coal Controller, the Colliery and the Company. Ultimately the Railway Administration served a notice on April 28, 1955, on the Company and the Colliery that they intended to sell the coal of which delivery was not taken, and on June 2, 1955, the coal was sold for Rs. 1,050. Claiming that it was entitled to demurrage for 202 days during which its wagons were detained at the rate of Rs. 90 per day, the Railway filed an action against the Colliery and the Company in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Sasaram, for a decree for Rs. 17,625/14/- being the charges for demurrage and freight payable in respect of the consignment less Rs. 1,050 realised from sale of the coal. The suit was decreed by the Subordinate Judge against the Company for Rupees 1,620/10 - with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from December 19, 1957 till realisation and proportionate cost. The suit was dismissed against the colliery.

2. Against the decree, the Company and the Railway appealed to the High Court of Patna. The High Court modified the decree passed by the Trial Court and decreed the claim of the Railway against the Company in full. With certificate granted by the High Court under Article 133 (1) (c) of the Constitution these two appeals have been preferred by the Company which have been consolidated for trial.

3. Two contentions are raised in support of these appeals:

(1) that the Company being a consignee of the goods booked by the Colliery there was no privity of contract between the Company and the Railway and no claim for demurrage or freight lay at the instance of the Railway against the Company; and

(2) that in any event the Railway ought to be awarded demurrage for only 22 days out of the total period for which the wagons were detained.

4. At the material time coal was a controlled commodity: supply and delivery of coal could be made only under orders issued by the Coal Controller Sale and delivery of coal were governed by the Colliery Control Order, 1945 issued under Rule 81 of the Defence of India Rules and continued under the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946, and the Bihar Coal Control Order, 1947. It was common ground that coal could not be sold by a Colliery except under an order of the Coal Commissioner or his Deputy. On July 13, 1954, the Deputy Coal Commissioner (Distribution) issued an order addressed to the Divisional Superintendent, Eastern Railway, sanctioning the supply of 110 tons of steam coal by the East Keshalpur Colliery to the Company. By that order a priority supply of wagons was also sanctioned in favour of the Company for transport of coal to the Banjari railway station. It was also recorded in the order that the quantity of coal mentioned in the order "had been sanctioned on the account of the Company" and that sanction for priority supply of wagons had also been accorded, and the Company was advised to instruct the Colliery to indent for wagons accordingly and to quote the sanction number given in the order when so indenting. Copies of

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top