SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 198

Cricket Club Of India – Appellant
Versus
Bombay Labour Union – Respondent


Advocates:
B.R.AGRAWAL, C.M.MEHTA, C.S.S.RAO, GAGRAT JANEDRA LAL, K.R.CHAUDHARY, K.RAJENDRA CHAUDHARY, S.B.Naik, S.D.VIMADALAL

Judgement

BHARGAVA, J.: The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Bombay, referred for adjudication by the industrial Tribunal, Maharashtra, Bombay (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal"), under S. 10 (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), a dispute between the Cricket Club of India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the Club") and the workmen employed by it in respect of various demands made by the workman relating to classification of employees, dearness allowance, leave facilities, payment for overtime, permanency, shift allowance, etc. A preliminary objection was taken on behalf of the Club that it is not an industry and, consequently, the provisions of the Act were inapplicable and no reference could be competently made under Sec. 10 (2) of the Act. The Tribunal rejected this preliminary objection holding that the Club came within the definition of "industry" in Section 2 (j) of the Act and made a direction that the case be set down for hearing on merits. The Club has appealed against this interim award of the Tribuanl of the preliminary question, by special leave.

2. The Club is admittedly a Members Club and is not a proprietary Club, though it


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top