SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 273

K.S.HEGDE, R.S.BACHAWAT, S.M.SIKRI
V. Sanjeevaraya Mudaliar – Appellant
Versus
N. A. Raghavachari – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, M.SRINIVASACHARI, R.THIAGARAJAN, S.C.Manchanda, T.A.Ramachandran

Judgement

BACHAWAT, J. :- The respondent is the owner of premises No.8, Brahmin Street, Saidapet, Madras. By a registered lease dated November 21, 1952 he let to the appellant the backyard of the premises for a term of 5 years. The backyard consisted of vacant land. The lease deed authorised the appellant to use land for boiling and drying paddy, to use the gate in the western compound wall for ingress and egress, to erect an opening in the wall for bringing in and taking out the paddy, and to erect a temporary shed or keeping the paddy on condition that while vacating the land he would dismantle the same. The deed specifically provided that the appellant "should not erect any kind of permanent super-structures on the said vacant site so as to entitle him to claim in future the value thereof," except such facilities as were necessary for drying paddy at his own expense. In contravention of this stipulation and without any authority from the respondent, the appellant erected permanent super-structures on the land. On the expiry of the lease the appellant refused to vacate the land. On March 12, 1959 the respondent filed a suit for his eviction. The appellant claimed protection under
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top