S.M.SIKRI, K.S.HEGDE, R.S.BACHAWAT
Rohtas Industries – Appellant
Versus
S. D. Agarwal – Respondent
Judgment
HEGDE, J. (For himself and Sikri J.):- The only question that arises for decision in these appeals by special leave, is whether the order made by the Central Government in No. 2(4)CL.I/63, Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry Department of Company Law Administration on April 11, 1968 is liable to be struck down as not having been made in accordance with law.
2. The appellant in these appeals is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act 1913 having its registered office at Dalmia Nagar, Shahbad District Bihar State. It is manufacturing paper, cement, sugar, vanaspati and other articles. Its authorised capital is rupees 15 crores and the paid up capital little more than six crores. It was incorporated in the year 1933.
The impugned order reads:
"No. 2(4)-CL. 1/63 Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Company Law Administration.
ORDER
Whereas the Central Government is of the opinion that there are circumstances suggesting that the business of Rohtas Industries Limited a company having its registered office at Dalmianagar, Bihar hereinafter referred to as the said company) is being conducted with intent to defraud its cr
distinguishing : Corporation of Calcutta V. Calcutta Tramways Co. Ltd.
referred : Joseph K. Vellukunpet v. The Reserve Bank of India
discussed : Hubbi Eltthuity Co. v. Promnit of Bombay Statt of Maharashtra v. B. K. Tahkamort
Provilue of Bombay v. K.S.Advani
State of Madras v. C. P. Sarathy and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.