SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 51

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.C. SHAH, V. RAMASWAMI AND A.N. GROVER, JJ.
The Commissioner of Income-tax, Mysore (In both the Appeals), Appellant,
Versus
D.C. Shah (In both the Appeals), Respondent.
Civil Appeals Nos. 817 and 818 of 1968,
D/-6-2-1969.
Advocates appeared
Mr. Niren De, Attorney-General for India, and Mr. S.C. Manchanda, Sr. Advocate, (Mr. R. N. Sachthey, Advocate with them), for Appellant; Mr. M. C. Chagla, Sr. Advocate, (M/s. Sharad J. Mhaispurkar and O. P. Malhotra, Advocates and O. C. Mathur, Advocate of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co. with him), for Respondent.

Advocates:
M.C.CHAGLA, NIREN DEY, O.C.MATHUR, O.P.MALHOTRA, R.N.SACH, S.C.Manchanda, SHARAD J.MHAISPUKAR

Headnote:

Taxation - Instrument of Partnership - Company - Assessment - Respondent is a Hindu Undivided Family- Assesse of which Shri D. C. Shah is Karta - Assessment years are 1959-60 and 1960-61 and relevant accounting periods are Samvat years 2014 and 2015 – Whether remuneration earned by a member of a Hindu Undivided Family as an officer of a company or a firm in which assets of Hindu Undivided Family have either been invested or office has been acquired with aid of funds of family is income of family or individual income of member has been subject-matter of consideration in several cases before this Court - Held, present case falls within principle laid down by this Court in S.R.M. Ct. PL. Palaniappa Chettiar s case, 68 ITR 221 (supra) - It has been found that Shri D. C. Shah was a man of rich experience in line of business which these two firms were carrying on. Clauses 9 and 10 of Partnership deed indicate that remuneration was paid not because of family funds invested in partnership but for personal qualification of Shri D. C. Shah - It follows that remuneration of Shri D.C. Shah was not earned on account of any detriment to joint family assets and amounts of remuneration received by Shri D.C. Shah as Managing partner of two partnerships were not assessable as income of Hindu Undivided Family - Appeals dismissed.

Judgment

RAMASWAMI, J.- The respondent is a Hindu Undivided Family (hereinafter called the assessee) of which Shri D. C. Shah is the Karta. The assessment years are 1959-60 and 1960-61 and the relevant accounting periods are Samvat years 2014 and 2015. The assessee through its karta Shri D. C. Shah was a partner in the firms of (1) M/s. C. U. Shah 1and Co. and (2) M/s. Oriental Can Manufacturing Co. as per terms and conditions set out in the Instruments of Partnership dated 5th June, 1961 and 11th September, 1957. Shri D. C. Shah was paid a remuneration of Rs. 12000/- per year for both the assessment years by M/s. C. U. Shah and Company. He was paid Rs. 10000/- for the assessment year 1959 -60 by the Oriental Can Manufacturing Company. The amounts received by Shri D. C. Shah were shown by the assessee in its returns of income along with balance of the share income from the aforesaid firms. The Income Tax Officer in assessing the Hindu Undivided family included the remuneration received by Shri D. C. Shah as a part of the share income from, the respective firms. Before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner the assessee contended that the remuneration received by Shri D. C. Shah was his personal income and the amounts were wrongly shown in the returns of the Hindu Undivided Family as its income and should not have been included in the assessment. In so contending the assessee relied on clauses 8, 9 and 10 of the Instrument of Partnership dated 5th June, 1961 by which the firm of M/s. C. U. Shah and Company was constituted. The assessee also relied on clauses 14, 15 and 16 of the Instrument of Partnership dated l1th September, 1957 by which the firm of M/s, Oriental Can Manufacturing Company was constituted. Clauses 8, 9 and 10 of the Instrument of Partnership dated 5th June, 1961 are to the following effect.

"8. The partner No. 1 Shri D. C. Shah who has been managing the business of this firm shall hereinafter also continue to act as Managing partner for conducting the said business free from any interference of other partners, of whatsoever nature. The said Managing partner shall manage, direct, appoint and/or remove any one of the employees, and/or do all other things, which include right to draw cheques, to make, deliver and accept documents either legal or commercial in respect of the partnership business as may be deemed necessary for effectively carrying on the partnership business. The said Managing partner shall be paid Rs. 1000/- (Rupees one thousand only) per month in addition to all other benefits that he is entitled to enjoy as a partner of the firm.

9. The said Managing partner shall continue to be the Managing Partner for his lifetime or his retirement whichever is earlier.

10. All other partners shall devote as much time to the furtherance of the partnership business as they think proper, necessary and advisable".

Clauses 14, 15 and 16 of the Instrument of Partnership dated 11th September, 1957 are to the following effect:

"14. The partner No. 2 shall be the Managing Partner for conducting the said business free from any interference of whatsoever nature by others. The said Managing Partner shall manage, carry, direct, appoint and/or remove any of the employees and/or Agent and do all other things, as may be deemed necessary, for effectively carrying on the Partnership business. The said Managing Partner shall be entitled, in addition to all other benefits, to a monthly remuneration of Rs. 2000/- (Rupees two thousand only).

15. The Partner No. 2. continue to be the Managing Partner for his lifetime or retirement the event of Partner No. 2 s demise or retirement, whichever is earlier, the Partner No. 1. shall then act and perform duties and functions of Managing Partner. In the event of the demise or retirement of Partner No. 1, the Managing Partner shall be appointed by the remaining partners or their legal representatives, as the case may be.

16. Partner No. 3 shall be responsible for the duties and functions to be per












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top