SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 385

A.N.GROVER, J.C.SHAH, V.RAMASWAMI
President Of India – Appellant
Versus
Sushanta Goswami – Respondent


Judgement

GROVER, J.: This is a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution by Sushanta Goswami and 46 others for a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus challenging the detention of the petitioners under the provisions of the Preventive Detention Act 1950, hereinafter called the "Act".

2. Petitioner No. 4 Krishna Mondal and Petitioner No. 21 Madhu Kanjilal are stated to have been released. No orders need be made with regard to them. As regards petitioners Nos. 2, 8, 9, 15, 22, 24, 32, 41 and 47 their matters will be taken up for consideration later as the State has been directed to file further affidavits. We now proceed to dispose of the cases of the other petitioners.

3. Petitioner No. 1 (Sushanta Goswami) -This petitioner was detained by an order of the District Magistrate 24 Parganas dated July 30, 1968. His detention was directed underSection3 (2) of the Act on the ground that it was necessary with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. The grounds were supplied to him and he made a representation to the Advisory Board which after hearing the petitioner and considering his representation, expressed its opinion that ther




























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top