SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.C. SHAH, V. RAMASWAMI AND A.N. GROVER, JJ.
The Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal I and another (In both the Appeals), Appellants
Versus
Allahabad Bank Ltd, (In both the Appeals), Respondent.
Civil Appeals, Nos. 701and 702 of 1968, D/- 14-2-1969. 1059
Advocates Appeared
M/s. S. T. Desai and S. C. Manchanda, Sr. Advocates (Mr. B. D. Sharma, Advocate with them), for Appellants (In both the Appeals); M/s. Sachin Chaudhuri and Sukumar Mitra, Sr. Advocates, (Mr. D. N. Mukherjee, Advocate, with them), for Respondent (In both the Appeals).
Companies Act 1 of 1956 - Sections 78 (3) r/w 78 (1) - Finance Acts 1956 and 1957 - Indian Companies Act 1913 - English Companies Act, 1948 - Section 56 - Company s share - Reduction in rebate in super-tax – Assessment - Allahabad Bank Ltd. is a public limited company - Paid up share capital of Company other than capital entitled to a dividend at a fixed rate was at relevant time Rs. 30,50,000 - Company had issued before January 1, 1954, shares at premium and premium received in cash aggregated to Rs. 45,50,000 - In each of account years 1955 and 1956 Company distributed Rs. 5,49,000 as dividend - Held, To secure that object Parliament gave an incentive to Company of substantial rebate in payment of super-tax which would be liable to be forfeited, if part of dividend exceeding 6 per cent was distributed to shareholders - Share Premium account is accordingly liable to be included in paid up capital for purpose of computing rebate if it is maintained as a separate account - Explanation does not contemplate that account must be kept apart from reserves - If within reserves it is an identifiable separate account, share premium will qualify for inclusion in paid-up capital in computing reduction in rebate of super-tax - Appeals dismissed.
Judgment
SHAH, J.: The Allahabad Bank Ltd. is a public limited company. The paid up share capital of the Company other than capital entitled to a dividend at a fixed rate was at the relevant time Rs. 30,50,000. The Company had issued before January 1, 1954, shares at premium and the premium received in cash aggregated to Rs. 45,50,000. In each of the account years 1955 and 1956 the Company distributed Rs. 5,49,000 as dividend.
2. In proceedings for assessment for each of the assessment years 1956-57 and 1957-58 the Income-tax Officer reduced by Rs. 61,000 the rebate in super-tax admissible under the Finance Act 1956 on the view that the Company had distributed dividend exceeding 6% of its paidup capital. In reducing the rebate the Income-tax Officer did not take into consideration share premium amounting to Rs. 45,50,000 received by the Company.
3. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that the Company s share premium was liable to be added to the capital of Rs. 30,50,000 in computing the reduction in the rebate in super-tax, and directed modification of the order of assessment. The Appellate Tribunal agreed with the Appellate Assistant Commissioner.
4. The Tribunal then submitted a statement of the case and submitted the following question in respect of the year 1956-57 to the High Court of Calcutta:
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the amount of Rs. 45,50,000 should be added to the paidup capital of the assessee as on 1st January, 1955, for the purpose of allowing rebate to the assessee under Paragraph D of Part II of the First Schedule to the Indian Finance Act, 1956."
A similar question relating to the assessment year 1957-58 was so referred by the Tribunal. The High Court of Calcutta agreed with the Tribunal and held that in determining the reduction in rebate in super-tax admissible to the Company the share premium maintained by the Company within the reserves was liable to be included in the paid-up capital.
5. The Finance Act, 1956 prescribed the rate of super-tax in Part II. Paragraph D (in so far as it is relevant) enacted:
"In the case of every company-
Rate
On the whole of total income. Six annas and nine pies in the rupee:
Provided that-
(i) a rebate at the rate of five annas per rupee of the total income shall be allowed in the case of any company which-
(a) in respect of its profits liable to tax under the Income-tax Act for the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1957, has made the prescribed arrangements for the declaration and payment within the territory of India of the dividends payable out of such profits and for the deduction of super-tax from dividends in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (3D) of Section 18 of that Act, and
(b) * * * * * * *
(ii) a rebate at the rate of four annas per rupee of the total income shall be allowed in the case of any Company which satisfied condition (a) but not condition (b) of the preceding clause; Provided further that-
(i) the amount of the rebate under clause (i) or * * * * * of the preceding proviso shall be reduced by the sum, if any, equal to the amount or the aggregate of the amounts as the case may be, computed as hereunder:
(a) * * * * * * *
(b) in addition, in the case of a company referred to in clause (ii) of the preceding proviso which has distributed to its share-holders during the previous year "dividends in excess of six per cent of its paid-up capital not being dividends payable at a fixed rate-
on that part of the said dividends which exceeds 6 per cent but does not exceed 10 per cent of the paidup capital; at the rate of two annas per rupee
on that part of the said dividends which exceeds 10 per cent of the paid-up capital; at the rate of three annas per rupee;
(ii) * * * *
Provided further that * *
Explanation:- For the purposes of Paragraph D of this Part-
(i) the expression "paid-up capital" means the paid-up capital (other than capital entitled to a dividend at a fixed rate) of the Company as on the first day of the previo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.