SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 104

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
State of Punjab and others, etc., Appellants
Versus
Chandu Lal Kishori Lal etc., Respondents.
State of Punjab and others. Appellants,
Versus
Krishna Cotton, Dal and Oil Factory, Mansa etc. Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 2516 to 2519 of 1966 and Civil Appeals Nos. 806 and 807 of 1967,
D/- 27-2-1969.
Civil Appeals Nos. 2516 to 2519 of 1966.
Civil Appeals Nos. 806 and 807 of 1967.
Advocates Appeared
M/s. V. C. Mahajan and R. N. Sachthey, Advocates, for Appellants (In all the Appeals); Mr. Hardev Singh, Advocate, for Respondents, (In C. As. Nos. 2517 and 2519 of 1966) and (In C. As. Nos. 806 and 807 of 1967).

Advocates:
HARDEV SINGH, R.N.SACH, V.C.MAHAJAN

Headnote:

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 14 and 15 - Punjab Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Section 5 (2) (a) (vi) - Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Section 2 (c), 14 and 15 - Partnership firm - Business of buying and selling cotton - Restrictions and conditions in regard to tax on sales or purchases of declared goods - Respondent is a partnership firm carrying on business of buying and selling cotton and also of ginning and pressing cotton at Barnala - Respondent purchased unginned cotton and after ginning cotton by a mechanical process and removing seeds sold ginned cotton to customers outside State - For period from 1st April, 1961 to 31st March, 1962, respondent paid purchase tax on purchase turnover - Held, Appellants are right in their contention that ginning process is a manufacturing process - But question presented for determination in present case is somewhat different viz., whether respondent is entitled to exemption under Section 5 (2) (a) (vi) of Act in context and setting of language of Sections 14 and 15 Act, 1956. "Declared goods" in Section 14 of Act, 1956 are individually specified under separate items "Cotton ginned or unginned" is treated as a single commodity under one item of declared goods - Appeals allowed.

Judgement

RAMASWAMI, J.: In this case the respondent is a partnership firm carrying on the business of buying and selling cotton and also of ginning and pressing cotton at Barnala. The respondent purchased unginned cotton and after ginning the cotton by a mechanical process and removing the seeds sold the ginned cotton to customers outside the State. For the period from 1st April, 1961 to 31st March, 1962, the respondent paid purchase tax on the purchase turnover. In respect of cotton-seeds sold by it to registered dealers, the respondent claimed deduction from the purchase turnover under S. 5 (2) (a) (vi) of the Punjab Sales Tax Act, 1948 (Act No. 46 of 1948). But the assessing authority did not allow the deduction holding that the goods sold viz., cotton-seeds were not the goods in respect of which purchase tax had been levied. In other words, the assessing authority took the stand that the unginned cotton underwent a manufacturing process and the goods produced were different from those purchased. So the respondent firm was assessed to pay a tax of Rs. 16,452 by the order of the assessing authority dated 11th September, 1963. The respondent firm thereafter filed a writ petition No. 1917 of 1963 in the Punjab High Court for quashing the assessment. The writ petition was allowed by the High Court which quashed the assessment and directed the assessing authority to re-determine the tax in the light of its judgment. In allowing the writ petition of the respondent the High Court followed its previous decision in Patel Cotton Company Private Ltd. v. State of Punjab, 1964-15 STC 865 (Punj). The appellants preferred a Letters Patent Appeal which was dismissed. The present appeal is brought by certificate from the judgment of the Punjab High Court dated 31st March, 1965.

2. It is necessary at this stage to set out the relevant provisions of the Punjab Sales Tax Act, 1948 (Act No. 46 of 1948) (hereinafter called the Act). Section 2 (ff) omitting immaterial portions defines purchase thus:" -

" Purchase with all its grammatical or cognate expressions means the acquisition of goods specified in Schedule C . . . . . . " Schedule C Entry (1) and Entry (3) road thus :

"(1) Cotton, that is to say, all kinds of cotton (indigenous or imported) in its unmanufactured state whether ginned or unginned, baled, pressed or otherwise, but not including cotton waste".

"(3) Oil-seeds, that is to say, seeds yielding non-volatile oils used for human consumption or in industry, or in the manufacture of varnishes, soaps and the like or in lubrication and volatile oils used chiefly in medicines, perfumes, cosmetics and the like."

Section 5 (2) (a) (vi) of the Act is to the following effect:

"5(2) In this Act the expression "taxable turnover" means that part of dealer s gross turnover during any period which remains after deducting therefrom

(a) his turnover during that period on

* * * * *

(vi) the purchase of goods which are sold not later than six months after the close of the year, to a Registered Dealer, or in the course of inter-State trade or commerce, or in the course of export out of the country".

3. Section 2 (c) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (Act No. 74 of 1956) defines declared goods to mean goods declared under Section 14 to be of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce. Under Section 14 of this Act certain goods were declared to be of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce and they included cotton that is to say all kinds of cotton (indigeneous or imported) in its unmanu factured state, whether ginned or unginned, baled, processed or otherwise, but not including cotton waste. Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax, 1956 has been amended from time to time. Originally Section 15 reads as follows:-

"15. Restrictions and conditions in regard to tax on sales or purchases of declared goods: Notwithstanding anything contained in the sales tax law of any State, the tax payable by any dealer under that law in respect of any sales o














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top