SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.M. SIKRI, R.S. BACHAWAT, AND K.S. HEGDE, JJ.
State of Orissa and another, Appellants
Versus
Binode Kishore Mohapatra, Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 2162 of 1968,
D/- 11-4-1969.
Advocates Appeared
Mr. Niren De, Attorney-General for India, (M/s. Santosh Chatterjee and R. N. Sachthey, Advocates, with him), for Appellants; M/s. B. M. Patnaik, Vinoo Bhagat and P. C. Bhartari, Advocates and M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., for Respondent.
Indian Police Cadre Rules, 1950 - Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulation, 1955 - Regulation 3 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 133 (1) (c) - Writ of mandamus - Service matter - Fixation of Seniority list - Seeking direction to respondents to fix petitioner s seniority and year of allotment as 1948 instead of year 1951 fixed by Government of India - High Court quashed order of Union Government, and directed Central Government to fix the year of allotment and seniority of petitioner in accordance with its judgment and law - Petitioner was appointed as Deputy Superintendent of Police in State of Orissa on January 1, 1947 - He was confirmed as D. S. P. In meantime an agreement had been arrived at between Central Government and some State Governments, including Orissa, regarding the constitution of an Indian Police Service - Held, Letters written by the State Government on point but no letter from the Government of India has been shown which could possibly be read as approving his period of officiation prior to Frbruary 10, 1956. At any rate approval of Government of India has to be accorded after the appointment to I. P. S. and not before - Court have not been able to appreciate how this case has any relationship to case of petitioner - It is impossible to pass an order, assuming that appellant is able to convince us that a breach of rules was committed, altering list of seniority, unless those who are likely to be affected thereby are before Court and have an opportunity of replying to case set up by appellant - This is a salutary rule and should be observed - But learned Counsel for petitioner says that he was concerned with his year of allotment and in that question nobody else was interested directly - Appeal allowed.
Judgement
SIKRI, J.: This is an appeal by certificate granted by the High Court of Orissa under Article 133 (1) (c) of the Constitution from the judgment and order of the High Court in Writ Petition O. J. C. No. 156 of 1965 filed by B. K. Mohapatra, I. P. S., hereinafter referred to as the petitioner, against the State of Orissa and the Union of India. In this petition the petitioner had prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to fix the petitioner s seniority and year of allotment as 1948 instead of the year 1951 fixed by the Government of India. The High Court quashed the order of the Union Government, dated July 22, 1958, and directed the Central Government to fix the year of allotment and seniority of the petitioner in accordance with its judgment and the law.
2. In order to appreciate the points raised before us it is necessary to set out the facts somewhat in detail. The petitioner was appointed as Deputy Superintendent of Police in the State of Orissa on January 1, 1947. On January 1, 1950, he was confirmed as D. S. P. In the meantime an agreement had been arrived at between the Central Government and some State Governments, including Orissa, regarding the constitution of an Indian Police Service. This agreement is printed as annexure to the Indian Police Cadre Rules, 1950. This agreement provided for various matters such as the strength, including both the number and character of posts of the Indian Police Service, the method of recruitment to the Service, framing of rules regarding conditions of service, the penalties which could be imposed, etc. We are concerned, in particular, with para 2 (e) and para 7 which are as under:
"2 (e) The rules regulating the promotion of Provincial Police Service Officers to the Indian Police Service shall be framed by the Provincial Government concerned in consultation with the Federal Public Service Commission shall provide that no Provincial Police Service Officer shall be appointed to hold a superior post included in the Schedule for a period of more than one year unless the Federal Public Service Commission have certified that the officer is in every way fit to hold a superior post in the Indian Police Service.
7. In order to ensure that the conditions of service applicable to officers of the Indian Police Service are as uniform as possible, rules regulating pay and other conditions of services will be framed by the Central Government to such extent as may be considered necessary. Provincial Governments will, however, be consulted before the rules are framed, and before they are amended in any manner. In respect of matters not covered by the said rules, an officer of the Indian Police Service will be governed by such rules as may be framed by the Government under which he is for the time being serving and, if no such rules are framed, by the rules applicable to the Central Service/Provincial Police Service Class I, as the case may be."
3. The All India Services Act, 1951, came into force on October 29, 1951. Section 3 enabled the Central Government to make rules for the regulation of recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to an All India Service which was defined to include, among others, the Indian Police Service. Section 4 provided:
"All rules in force immediately before the commencement of this Act and applicable to an All India Service shall continue to be in force and shall be deemed to be rules made under this Act."
4. On April 30, 1951, the State Government wrote to the Secretary, Union Punjab Service Commission, that they proposed to hold a meeting of the committee (to be constituted in accordance with R. 2 of the Draft Rules) sometime in June 1951 with a view to prepare a select list of officers suitable for promotion to the Indian Police Service. The Commission was asked to depute one of its members to preside over the said meeting in accordance with Rule 3 of the Draft Rules. On September 6, 1951, the Union Public Service Commission approved
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.