SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 121

S.M.SIKRI, R.S.BACHAWAT, K.S.HEGDE
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Bhaishankar Avalram Joshi – Respondent


For the Appellant :Vishnu Gupta and Raghu Mehta, Advocates

Judgement

SIKRI, J.: This appeal by special leave arises out of the suit filed by Bhaishankar Avalram Joshi, hereinafter rerented to as the plaintiff for a declaration that the order of dismissal, dated February 2/4, 1955, passed by the Inspector General of Prisons, Saurashtra, was illegal and void on the ground that it contravened the provisions of Article 311 (2) of the Constitution. The plaintiff also prayed for a decree for Rs. 2,690/- being arrears of his pay from April 1, 1954, to May 7, 1956.

2. The plaintiff failed before the Civil Judge, Rajkot, but on appeal succeeded before the District Judge, Central Saurashtra, inasmuch as he declared the order dated February 2/4, 1955, illegal and void. The plaintiff appealed to the High Court claiming arrears of salary and the State of Bombay filed cross-objections praying that the suit be dismissed. The second appeal was heard by the High Court of Gujarat (Miabhoy J. who directed that the decree passed by the lower appellate court "be varied so as to show that the appellant (plaintiff) continued to be in Government service till date of the suit only and there will be a decree for Rs. 2,690/- being arrears of pay due to the appellant (

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top