P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, J.M.SHELAT
Appar Apar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
Judgment
VAIDIALINOAM, J.-The sole point that arises for consideration in this appeal by special leave is whether the order, dated April 26, 1964, passed by the Governor of Punjab reverting the appellant from the Punjab Education Service, Class I (Officiating Service) to the Punjab Education Service, Class II, with immediate effect, amounts to reduction in rank attracting the applicability of Article 311(2) of the Constitution.
2. The appellant when this order was passed was Principal, Government College, Muktsar and on reversion he was posted as Deputy Inspector of Schools, Agriculture, Chandigarh. The learned Single Judge, who heard Civil Writ No. 1506 of 1964, filed by the appellant to quash the said order, held by his judgment, dated September 9, 1965, that the order amounts to reduction in rank of the appellant and quashed the same. On appeal by the State of Punjab and two other officers, the Division Bench by its order, dated July 21, 1966, in Letters Patent Appeal No. 346 of 1965, set aside the order of the learned Single Judge and held that the impugned order of reversion was not passed by way of punishment and that on the other hand it was only reversion of the appellant
reffered to : Parshotam Lal Dhigar v. Union of India
Champaklal Chairmanlal shah v. The Union of India
Relied on : State of Punjab and Another v. Sukh Raj Bahadur
reffered to : State of orissa v. Ram Narain Das
Jagadish Mitter v. The Union of India
Union of India and Others v. R. S. Parshotam Lal Dhigar v. Union of Dhaba
reffered to : Champaklal Chiman lal Shah v. The Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.