A.N.RAY, G.K.MITTER, K.S.HEGDE, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, S.M.SIKRI
Lennart Schussler – Appellant
Versus
Director Of Enforcement – Respondent
Judgment
JAGANMOHAN REDDY, J. (on behalf of Sikri and Ray, JJ, and himself): The Director of Enforcement, New Delhi, filed complaint on February 16, 1969 before the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Madras against Lennart Schussler, accused No. 1, and M. R,. Pratap, accused 2 Managing Director, the Rayala Corporation Ltd. hereinafter referred to as A.1 and A.2 respectively under Section 120-B I. P. C. and Section 4 (3), 5 (1) (a) and 9 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (VII) of 1947 (hereinafter called the Act). Two Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions, one filed by A1 being No. 459 of 1969 and the other filed by A2 being No. 621 of 1969 for quashing the complaint were dismissed by the Madras High Court by a common judgment against which these two appeals by certificate have been filed.
2. The complaint which is in respect of the acquisition of 88913.09 Swiss Kronars in contravention of the Act states that on reliable information received by the Assistant Director of Enforcement, Madras that A2 was utilising his position as Managing Director of the Rayala Corporation Ltd. in acquiring foreign exchange illicitly, on December 20, 1966, a search was conducted of the premises of the said com
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.