SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 512

J.C.SHAH, K.S.HEGDE
State Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Maharaja Shri B. P. Singh Deo – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :P.N. Raina, Sr. Advocate and J.A. Hamal, Advocate
For the Respondents:K.M. Bhatti, Advocate

Judgment

HEGDE, J.:- These appeals by certificate arise from the decision of the High Court of Orissa in Cases Nos. 82 and 83 of 1963 on its file wherein the High Court in exercise of its powers under Section 29 (iii) of the Orissa Agricultural Income-tax Act (to be hereinafter referred to as the Act) set aside the judgment of the Agricultural Income-tax Appellate. Tribunal as well as that of the Assistant Collector of Agricultural Income-tax, Sambalpur. The question for consideration is whether the High Court was justified in law in interfering with the order of the tribunal.

2. These appeals relate to the assessment of the assessee under the Act for the years 1952-1953 and 1953-1954. The assessing authority namely the Agricultural Income-tax Officer being unable to rely on the books of account produced by the assessee, assessed him on the basis of best of judgment. For the assessment year 1952-1953, he estimated his net income at Rs. 34,233/- and for the assessment year 1953-1954 at Rs. 35,100/- and levied tax on that basis. Aggrieved by that decision, the assessee went up in appeal to the Assistant Collector of Agricultural Income-tax. The Assistant Collector not only dismissed th






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top