SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 363

A.N.GROVER, J.C.SHAH
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Kokiliagada Meerayya – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :P.S. Ahmad, Advocate
For the Respondents: Javaid Iqbal

Judgment

SHAH, J. :- K. Meerayya, K. Venkatanarayana - respondents in this appeal - and two others were charged before the Judicial Magistrate, IInd Class, Avanigadda, for offences under Sections 323 and 324, Indian Penal Code for voluntarily causing injuries to Seetharamayya and Veeraraghavayya on June 22, 1964. The Trial Magistrate convicted Meerayya and Venkatanarayana - the first under the offence under Section 324 and the second for the offence under Section 323, Indian Penal Code. In appeal to the Court of Session, Krishna Division, at Machilipatnam, the order was confirmed. The High Court, in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction, set aside the order of conviction and sentence. The State of Andhra Pradesh has appealed to this Court, with special leave.

2. The case raises a question of some importance in the administration of justice. The findings recorded by the Trial Magistrate and confirmed by the Sessions Judge were that the respondents had committed assault upon Seetharamayya and Veeraraghavayya and that they could in law be properly convicted. But it was urged that there was a bar against prosecution of the two accused Meerayya and Venkatanarayana because of the "princi


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top