SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 185

J.C.SHAH, K.S.HEGDE
Mahabir Prasad Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
C.B.AGARWAL, J.P.GOYAL, O.P.RANA, P.C.Parashar

Judgment

SHAH, J.: The appellants held a licence under the U. P. Sugar Dealers Licensing Order, 1962, to deal in sugar as wholesale distributors. They also held a licence under the U. P. Foodgrains Dealers Licensing Order, 1964. By letter dated June 5, 1967 the appellants were called upon to explain certain irregularities detected on inspection of their shop by the Assistant Commissioner of Food and Civil Supplies on April 24, 1967. On the following day the appellants were directed to hand over all their stocks of sugar and flour to the Bindki Co-operative Marketing Society. Representations against the order directing the appellants to deliver their stocks made to the District Magistrate, Fatehpur, were not even attended to, and the appellants were obliged to surrender their stocks of sugar and flour. By letter dated June 28, 1967 the appellants were informed that the District Magistrate, Fatehpur, had cancelled their licences as dealers in sugar and flour. The appellants applied for a copy for the order, but it was not supplied.

2. Against the order of the District Magistrate, the appellants submitted an appeal under Clause 8 of the Sugar Dealers Licensing Order, 1962, on July 19










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top