SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 245

J.C.SHAH, K.S.HEGDE, A.N.GROVER
Commissioner Of Income Tax, U. P. – Appellant
Versus
J. P. Kanodia And Company – Respondent


Advocates:
B.D.SHARMA, G.C.Sharma, JAGADISH SVARUP, M.V.GOSWAMY

Judgment

SHAH, J.: M/s. J. P. Kanodia and Company is a firm registered under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The partners of the firm were Smt. Shanti Devi and Badri Prasad. Three minors Pradeep Kumar, Anand Prakash and Rajendra Prasad were admitted to the benefits of the partnership.

2. In proceedings for assessment on tax for the assessment year 1957-58, the Income-tax Officer rejected the claim of the firm to set off loss from certain speculative transactions aggregating to Rs. 22,234/- and computed the income of the firm at Rs.25,365/-. The Income-tax Officer was of the opinion that since the capital contributed by the partners and the minors who were admitted to the benefits of the partnership was out of the capital of the respective Hindu Undivided Families to which they belonged, the profits allocated to the partners and to the minors were liable to be assessed in the hands of the respective Hindu Undivided Families to which they belonged.

3. The order passed by the Income-tax Officer was confirmed in a revision application by the Commissioner. The firm then moved a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Allahabad. Two contentions were raised in s












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top