SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.C. SHAH AND V. RAMASWAMI, JJ.
Nani Gopal Mitra, Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 181 of 1965, D/- 15-10-1968.
Advocates appeared
Mr. S. C. Agarwala, Advocate of M/s. Ramamurthi and Co., for Appellant; Mr. D. Goburdhun, Advocate, for Respondent.
Indian Penal Code,1860 – Section 379, 411, 406 and 420, 474/466 and 120-B – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 225 - Offence of Criminal conspiracy – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property – Theft – Charged - appeal by special leave - Appellant was employed as a Railway Guard on Eastern Railway and was posted at Railway Station - (P. W. 47) who was in charge of squad of travelling ticket examiners caught hold of (P. W. 54) as he found him working as a bogus travelling ticket examiner in a train. P. W. 47 handed to(P. W. 48) who was a police officer in charge of Railway out-post - A Fard Beyan was recorded on statement of P. W. 47 and G.R.P. Case No. 12(1) 58 was registered against - In connection with investigation of that case house of appellant which was at a distance of 300 yards from Railway station was searched at about along with other police officers - Various articles were recovered from house of appellant and a search list (Ex. 5/17) was prepared - A chargesheet was submitted in G.R.P. Case No. against appellant – Held, It was argued that charge did not disclose amounts appellant took as bribes and persons from whom he taken such bribes and the appellant had therefore no opportunity to prove his innocence - But, in Court view, this circumstance does not invalidate charge, though it may be a ground for asking for better particulars - No error in stating either offence or particulars required to be stated in charge, and no omission to state offence or those particulars, shall be regarded at any stage of case as material, unless accused was in fact misled by such error or omission, and it has occasioned a failure of justice" - It also appears that appellant never raised any objection either before Special Judge or in High Court on score that charge was defective and that he was misled in his defence on ground that no particulars of persons from whom bribes were taken were mentioned – Court accordingly reject argument of appellant on this point - Appeal dismissed.
Judgment
RAMASWAMI, J.- This appeal is brought, by special leave, from the judgment of the Patna High Court dated September 14, 1965 in Criminal Appeal No. 268 of 1962 filed by the appellant against the judgment of the Special Judge, Santhal Parganas, Dumka, dated March 31, 1962.
2. In January, 1958 the appellant was employed as a Railway Guard on the Eastern Railway and was posted at Shibganj Railway Station. On January 18, 1958, Hinga Lal Sinha (P. W. 47) who was in charge of squad of travelling ticket examiners caught hold of Shambu Pada Banerji (P. W. 54) as he found him working as a bogus travelling ticket examiner in a train. P. W. 47 handed Shambu Pada Banerji to Md. Junaid (P. W. 48) who was a police officer in charge of Barharwa Railway out-post. A Fard Beyan was recorded on the statement of P. W. 47 and G.R.P. Case No. 12(1) 58 was registered against Shambu Pada Banerji. In connection with the investigation of that case the house of the appellant which was at a distance of 300 yards from Sahebganj Railway station was searched on January 19, 1958 at about 3 p.m. by P. W. 56 along with other police officers, Md. Junaid (P. W. 48) and Dharmadeo Singh (P. W. 57). Various articles were recovered from the house of the appellant and a search list (Ex. 5/17) was prepared. A chargesheet was submitted in G.R.P. Case No. 12(1)58 against the appellant and Shambu Pada Banerji. Both of them were tried and convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Dumka, by a judgment dated June 12, 1961. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No. 405 of 1961 against his conviction under S. 474/466 of the Indian Penal Code. The appeal was allowed by the High Court by its judgment dated September 14, 1962, on the ground that there was no proof that the appellant was in conscious possession of the incriminating articles.
3. During the course of the investigation of G. R. P. Case No. 12(1)58, the investigating officer (P. W. 56) found a sum of Rs.51,000 standing to the credit of the appellant in the Eastern Railway Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Calcutta. He also found the appellant in possession of National Savings Certificates of the value of Rs.8,000. On August 24, 1958, the Investigating Officer (P. W. 56) handed over charge of the investigation of G.R.P. Case No. 12(1) 58 to P. W. 46 of Sahebganj Government Railway Police Station. P. W. 46 completed the investigation on February 26, 1958. Since by that time it was found that the appellant was in possession of pecuniary resources disproportionate to his known sources of income it was thought that he had come in possession of these pecuniary resources by committing acts of misconduct as defined in clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) of S. 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (Act 2 of 1947), hereinafter referred to as the Act , and since the investigation of a case under the Act could be carried only in accordance with the provisions of S. 5A of the Act, under the orders of the superior officers, the case being G.R.P. Case No. 12(1) 58 was split up in the sense that a new case against the appellant being Sahebganj Police Station Case No. 11(2)59 was started upon the first information report of P. W. 46 made on February 26, 1959 to Gokhul Jha (P. W. 45), Officer in charge of Sahebganj Police Station. By his order dated February 27, 1959, Sri R. P. Lakhaiyar, Magistrate, First Class, Sahebganj, accepted the recommendation of the Deputy Superintendent of Police that Inspector Madhusudan Haldhar, P. W. 55, may investigate the case. Accordingly, Madhusudan Haldhar, P. W. 55, proceeded to investigate the case and after obtaining the sanction of the appropriate authority for prosecution of the appellant submitted a charge-sheet on March 31, 1960. Cognizance was taken and the case was transferred to Sri Banerji, a Magistrate, First Class, who committed the appellant and the two co-accused Baldeo Prasad and Mrs. Kamla Mitra to stand trial before the Court of Session. By his judgment dated
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.