SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 294

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.C. SHAH, ACTG. C.J.I., V. RAMASWAMI AND A.N. GROVER, JJ.
K. C. Nambiar, Appellant
Versus
The IV Judge of Court of Small Causes, Madras and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 2225 of 1966, D/- 18-8-1969. 1657
Advcoates appeared
M/s. K. K. Venugopal and R. Gopalakrishnan, Advocates, for Appellant; Miss Lily Thomas, Advocate, for Respondent No. 3, Mr. S. Govind Swaminathan, Advocate General for the State of Tamil Nadu, (M/s. E. S. Govindan and A. V. Rangam, Advocates, with him), for Respondent No. 8.

Advocates:
A.V.RANGAM, E.S.GOVINDAN, K.K.VENUGOPAL, LILY ISABLE THOMAS, R.GOPAL KRISHNAN, S.GOVIND SWAMINATHAN

Headnote:

Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Section 4 - Application - Building - Tenant - Fair rent - Controller shall, on application by tenant or landlord of a building and after holding such inquiry as Controller thinks fit fix fair rent for such building in accordance with principles set out in sub-section (2) or in sub-section (3), as case may be, and such other principles as may be prescribed and shall include such allowances as may be made for considerations of locality in which non-residential building is situated, features of architectural interest, accessibility to market, nearness to railway station and such other amenities as may be prescribed and of purpose for which non-residential building is used - Landlord of premises applied to Controller claiming that fair rent of premises in occupation be fixed aper month – Held, argument that "cost of construction" of a building is to be such cost as may be prescribed, invites answer that a provision which, without any guidance, leaves it to executive authority to fix whatever that authority thinks is cost of construction, is invalid on ground of excessive delegation - If Legislature has sought to confer authority upon executive to fix rates and to fix rates and to call them cost of construction, Legislature has abdicated its authority in favour of the executive which in law is not permissible - But it has been a common feature of rent restriction legislation all over India that landlord is not allowed benefit of unearned increment on value of his construction - That is why in practically every statute relating to rent restriction legislation rent is pegged down to either a fixed period or to standard rent which is generally related to cost of construction originally incurred - Appeal allowed.

Judgment

SHAH, AG. C. J.: The Legislature of the State of Madras enacted the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. Section 4 of the Act (insofar as it is relevant) provides:

"(1) The Controller shall, on application by the tenant or the landlord of a building and after holding such inquiry as the Controller thinks fit fix the fair rent for such building in accordance with the principles set out in sub-section (2) or in sub-section (3), as the case may be, and such other principles as may be prescribed.

(2) * * * *

(3) (a) The fair rent for any non-residential building shall be at nine per cent, gross return per annum on the total cost of such building.

(b) The total cost referred in clause (a) shall consist of-

(i) the cost of construction as calculated according to such rates for such classes of non-residential building as may be prescribed less the depreciation at such rates as may be prescribed:

(ii) the market value of that portion of the site on which the non-residential building is constructed;

and shall include such allowances as may be made for considerations of locality in which the non-residential building is situated, features of architectural interest, accessibility to market, nearness to the railway station and such other amenities as may be prescribed and of the purpose for which the non-residential building is used.*(?)

Provided that such allowances shall not exceed twenty-five per cent of the cost of construction as calculated in the manner specified in sub-clause (i)."

Section 34 confers upon the State Government power to make rules to carry out the purposes of the Act. Pursuant to the authority conferred by the Act, the State Government has published rules. Rules 11 to 14 deal with classification of non-residential buildings, calculation of the cost of construction of the different classes of non-residential buildings, allowance for amenities in respect of non-residential buildings and calculation of depreciation of non-residential buildings. Rule 11 provides:

"R. 11 - "(1) Non-residential buildings shall be classified into two categories, namely:-

(i) Factories and godowns; and

(ii) other non-residential buildings".

"(2) The non-residential buildings belonging to the category specified in sub-rule (1) (ii) shall be classified into four different classes according to the classifications laid down in rule 8 in respect of residential buildings".

R. 12 - "(1) The cost of the construction of non-residential buildings belonging to the category specified in rule 11 (1) (i) shall be calculated at the rate of 62 naye Paise per cubic foot of the cubical content of the building.

(2) The cost of construction of the different classes of non-residential buildings belonging to the category specified in rule 11 (1) (ii) shall be calculated at the rates specified below:

Class I - Ground floor - Rs. 16 per square foot of plinth area.

First floor - Rs. 13 per square foot of plinth area.

Second floor - Rs. 12 per square foot of plinth area.

Class II - Ground floor - Rs. 13 per square foot of plinth area.

First floor - Rs. 10 per square foot of plinth area.

Second floor - Rs. 9 per square foot of plinth area.

Class III - Single storeyed - Rs. 10 per square foot of plinth area.

Class IV - Single storeyed - Rs. 5 per square foot of plinth area.

Note - In case of every additional floor higher up, the rate per square foot shall be one rupee less than the rate per square foot for the floor immediately below."

R. 13 - "When calculating the cost of construction of non-residential buildings, allowances shall be made for the following amenities in addition to those specified in Section 4 (3) -

(1) air-conditioning;

(2) lifts;

(3) electric fans;

(4) tube-lights;

(5) number of electric points;

(6) fans;

(7) ventilators;

(8) electric pump for water;

(9) flush-outs;

(10) fixed wash-basins;

(11) stair-cases;

(12) out-houses;

(13) cattle-sheds;

(14) garden or vacant ground appurtenant to the building enjoyed by the tenant; and

(15) usufructs of trees, if any, enjoyed b




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top