A.N.GROVER, J.C.SHAH, K.S.HEGDE
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Kulu Vallety Transport Company Private LTD. – Respondent
Judgment
SHAH, J.- The Kulu Vallye Transport Co. (P.) Ltd.- hereinafter called the Company - did not file returns of income in respect of the assessment years 1953-54 and 1954-55 within the period specified in the general notice under Section 22 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922. In January 1956, the Company filed voluntary returns disclosing loss of income in the course of its business amounting to Rs. 1,151,520 and Rs. 48,977, respectively, for the two years in question. The Income-tax Officer refused to determine the loss observing:
"This is a loss case and the return has been filed after the statutory time. The Company is, therefore, not entitled to the benefit of carry-forward of loss in the subsequent assessments. The case is, therefore, filed."
2. Against the order of the Income-tax Officer, appeals were preferred to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. That officer rejected the Company s request for extension for filing the returns, and dismissed the appeals, observing:
"The return made under Sec. 22 (2A) can only be taken to be a return under sub-section (1) of Section 22 for the purpose of this Act, if it is made within the statutory time prescribed in sub-section (2A) of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.