SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 484

P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, S.M.SIKRI, G.K.MITTER
State Of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Mohanlal – Respondent


Advocates:
JANARDAN SHARMA, R.N.SACH

Judgment

SIKRI J.: This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab accepting the petition filed by the rate-payers of Municipality Committee, Rohtak, Respondents before us, and ordering that the State Government shall not proceed with the constitution of the Rohtak Improvement Trust under the notification of August 30, 1961. The High Court allowed the petition because it held (1) that sub-section (3) of Sec. 1 of the Punjab Town Improvement Act (Punjab Act IV of 1922) - hereinafter referred to as the Act - only envisages the creation of a Trust in a Municipal area where a Committee is functioning and so is in a position to hold a special meeting to decide whether or not it considers the creation of trust desirable, and (2) that once a trust ceases to exist under Section 103 (1) of the Act in order to create a trust, the Act has to be applied again, and as the Municipality Committee had at a special meeting held on November 9, 1962, decided unanimously that the Act should not be applied the Government was bound to give effect to that decision.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Sachthey, contends that the High Court has placed a w
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top