(A) Contempt of Court - Composition of the Bench - Allegation of interest by judges - Petitioner challenged the competence of the Bench on the grounds that two judges were interested in the matter - Court directed the petitioner to file an affidavit setting out the facts supporting the allegations.

Facts of the case:
During the hearing of a criminal miscellaneous petition, the petitioner raised an objection to the composition of the Bench, alleging that two of the judges were interested in the case and thus incompetent to hear it. It was noted that in a previous petition, the petitioner had made similar allegations against almost all judges of the court, except the then Chief Justice and one other judge.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the petitioner to file an affidavit providing the facts to support the allegations of interest and incompetence.

Issues: Whether the petitioner's objection to the composition of the Bench was substantiated by facts.

Ratio Decidendi: The court required the party making allegations of judicial bias or interest to substantiate such claims through a formal affidavit.

Result: Not provided in the text.