SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 282

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
I.D. DUA, J.
Talib Hussain, Petitioner
Versus
State of J. and K., Respondent.
Writ Petn. No. 109 of 1970, D/- 7-7-1970.

Headnote:

Jammu & Kashmir Preventive Detention Act, 1964 - Section 3 (2) read with 5 , 8 and 13-A - Application - Arrest - Warrant - Order of detention - Petitioner was detained onpursuant to order dated - Petitioner was informed that it was against public interest to disclose to him grounds on which order of his detention had been made - Government approved order of detention - Order of detention was read out to petitioner and its contents explained to him in Urdu and the petitioner at time of detention affixed his signature on order as a token of having understood the sam - Order under Section 8 read with Section 13-A of J & K Preventive Detention Act to effect that it was against public interest to disclose to petitioner the grounds of detention was made and not on as suggested by Petitioner - Held, petitioner having been detained with a view to preventing him from acting in a manner prejudicial to security of State and it having been considered against public interest to disclose to him grounds of his detention - Petitioner was arrested and deprived of his personal liberty long before order of his arrest and this invalidated his detention, it is sufficient to point out that in habeas corpus proceedings Court has to consider legality of detention on date of hearing - If on date of hearing it cannot be said that aggrieved party has been wrongfully deprived of his personal liberty and his detention is contrary to law, a writ of habeas corpus cannot issue - Petitioner s detention cannot be considered to be contrary to procedure established by law and cannot be held to be illegal so as to justify his release - Petition fails and is dismissed.

Judgment

DUA, J.:- Talib Hussain @ Abdul Rehman son of Feroz Din forwarded through Central Jail, Jammu his application for a writ of habeas corpus. According to the averments made therein the petitioner was arrested on September 4, 1968 but the warrant for his detention was dated September 10, 1968. upto December 12, 1969, he was neither shown the warrant of detention nor were the grounds of his detention communicated to him He was served with a copy of the warrant of detention on December 12, 1969. The petitioner had by then already filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus (W. P. No. 400 of 1969) but that application was withdrawn by him. On December 5, 1968 the petitioner was transferred from interrogation centre to the Central Jail, Jammu. On December 10, 1968 he was told that the grounds of detention could not be disclosed to him and this was long after the expiry of ten days from his arrest. The petitioner was tortured at the interrogation centre, Jammu, and his signatures were forcibly obtained on a piece of blank paper. The petitioner claimed to be a permanent resident of village Azamabad, police station Thana Darhal, Tahsil and District Rajouri. His arrest was alleged to be mainly due to personal grudges of Fazal Hasan and Nazir Hasan.

2. According to the return the petitioner was detained on September 11, 1968 pursuant to the order dated September 10, 1968. The petitioner was informed that it was against public interest to disclose to him the grounds on which the order of his detention had been made. The Government approved the order of detention on September 30, l968. The order of detention was read out to the petitioner and its contents explained to him in Urdu and the petitioner at the time of detention affixed his signature on the order as a token of having understood the same. The order under Section 8 read with Section 13-A of the J & K Preventive Detention Act to the effect that it was against public interest to disclose to the petitioner the grounds of detention was made on September 10, 1968 and not on December 10, 1968 as suggested by the Petitioner. The date December 10, 1968 on the copy attached to the reply of the Government was due to a typing error.

3. On behalf of the petitioner it was argued that the petitioner s detention started prior to the order of detention and that his detention must on that account be held to be illegal from its inception and therefore wholly void justifying his release. It was further submitted that there was no material showing that the orders made against the petitioner were explained to him in his own language.

4. I had a look at the original records produced by the respondent. It is clear that the order of detention dated September 10, 1968 was explained to the petitioner on September 11, 1968. The order of detention is as under:

"Whereas I, C. B. Budgujar, I. A. S. District Magistrate, Rajouri, am satisfied that with a view to preventing Shri Talib Hussain @ Abdul Rehman s/o Feroz Din r/o Azamabad p/s Darhal now Guiran Wala, West Pakistan from acting in a manner prejudicial to the security of the State it is necessary so to do.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 (2) read with Section 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Preventive Detention Act, 1964, I, C. B. Budgujar, I. A. S. District Magistrate, Rajouri hereby direct that the said Talib Hussain @ Abdul Rehman s/o Feroz Din be detained in Additional Police Lock up p/s Saddar, Jammu, subject to such conditions as to maintenance, discipline and punishment for breaches of discipline as have been specified in the Jammu and Kashmir Detenus General Order of 1968."

The order under Sec. 8 read with Section 13-A of the Jammu and Kashmir Preventive Detention Act dated September 10, 1968 reads thus:

"Whereas Shri Talib Hussain @ Abdul Rehman s/o Feroz Din r/o Azamabad p/s Darhal now Gujranwala, West Pakistan, has been detained in pursuance of order No. DIR/27/68 dated 10-9-1968 made by me under Sec. 3 (2) read w










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top