SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 322

K.S.HEGDE, I.D.DUA
Munir Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

HEGDE, J.: - This is an appeal by special leave. The appellant and two others were tried for various offenses before the learned Sessions Judge, Rampur. The appellant was convicted under Sections 304 (I)/149, 307/149 and 323/149, I. P. C. We are not concerned with the convictions of the other accused. The sentences imposed on various counts were ordered to run concurrently. The maximum sentence imposed on the appellant is 10 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 304 (I). In appeal the appellant was acquitted under Section 304 (I), I. P. C. The sentence imposed on him under Ss. 307/149 was reduced from five years to two years rigorous imprisonment. His conviction under Section 323 was maintained for which a sentence of one year rigorous imprisonment had been awarded by the trial Court.

2. The incident giving rise to this prosecution took place on May 7, 1964 at about 10 p. m. The complainant as well as the appellant were having cycle stands near the exhibition ground, Rampur. The appellant and another had taken a cycle stand on contract from the municipal council. They were permitted to charge for each cycle 12 N. P. whereas the complainant was having a private cycle stan








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top