SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 68

A. N. GROVER, J. C. SHAH, K. S. HEGDE
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Assam And Nagaland – Appellant
Versus
G. Hyatt – Respondent


Advocates:
B.D.SHARMA, G.C.Sharma, JAGDISH SVARUP, R.N.SACH, T.A.Ramachandran

Judgment

HEGDE, J.: The Commissioner of Income-tax, Assam and Nagaland has brought this appeal by certificate. The assessment with which we are concerned in this appeal is for the assessment year 1963-64, the relevant accounting year is the financial year 1962-63. The assessee was the manager of a Tea Estate under the managing agency of M/s. Gillanders Arbuthnot & Co. Ltd. The said company had a Provident Fund scheme for its employees. But that provident fund was not a recognised one. The assesses retired during the previous year relevant to assessment year 1963-64 and received out of this provident fund an amount of Rs. 27,948/- which represented the interest on the amount of his own contribution to the fund. The Income-tax Officer assessed this amount as the assessee s income from other sources. That order was confirmed in appeal by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. But on further appeal to the tribunal by the assessee, the tribunal came to the conclusion that the receipt in question being profits in lieu of salary , the same was his salary as defined in Section 17 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (to be hereinafter referred to as the Act): the same having not been assessed as his
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top