SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 490

V.BHARGAVA, S.M.SIKRI, I.D.DUA
Ram Narain – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

DUA, J.: In this appeal by special leave we are only concerned with the question of sentence imposed on appellants 1. 2 and 3 by the High Court. They are Ram Narain son of Manni Lal Ahir, Babulal son of Bhikhari Ahir and Nankau son of Manni Lal. Special leave was declined to the other convicts who had applied along with the present appellants.

2. Eight Persons were tried in the Court of the 1st Temporary Sessions Judge, Kanpur for the murder of one Bitta. The three appellants with whom we are now concerned were alleged to have been armed respectively with deadly weapons like gandasa, sword and ballam. They were charged under Section 148. I. P. C. with having formed an unlawful assembly along with the five co-accused with the common object of committing the murder of the deceased. They were further charged under Section 302 read with Section 149, I. P. C. for Committing the said murder.

3. At the trial evidence was Ted to show that five accused Persons had direct enmity with the deceased and about the remaining three it was admitted that Shivnath, accused, is the brother of the wife of Rameshwar accused and Jai Jai Ram and Nankau (one of the appellants here) are cousins of the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top