SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 150

J.C.SHAH, K.S.HEGDE
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Champalal Kishanlal – Respondent


Advocates:
A.G.Ratnaparkhi, N.S.BINDRA, S.P.NAIR

Judgment

SHAH, J.:- Appeal No. 1878 of 1967 was ordered to be dismissed by this Court on July 17, 1969. The Court held that the sale of standing trees is not sale of goods chargeable to sales tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

2. A petition for review of Judgment has been filed by the State contending that after the judgment of the High Court and before the appeal was heard, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 was amended by the Maharashtra Act 15 of 1967 with retrospective operation, and by the amendment "standing timber" was included in the definition of goods, but counsel for the State failed to invite the attention of the Court to that Act. Since the judgment of this Court it is claimed suffers from an error apparent from the face of the record, we have granted review of judgment.

3. The expression "goods" was defined in Section 2 (13) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act. 1959. By Maharashtra Act, 15 of 1967 by Section 2 the definition of "goods" was altered by providing that -

" In Section 2 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 * * * in Clause (13), after the words "and commodities" the following shall be, and shall be deemed always to have been, added, namely :-

"and all standing timber wh








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top