SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M. HIDAYATULLAH, C.J.I., J.C. SHAH, K.S. HEGDE, A.N. GROVER, A.N. RAY AND I.D. DUA, JJ.
Ashoka Marketing Ltd., Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar and another, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 2004 of 1966, D/-30 1-1970.
Advocates appeared
Mr. S. V. Gupta, Sr. Advocate, (Mr. H. K Puri, Advocate, for Mr. K. K. Jain Advocate, with him), for Appellant; Mr. Lal Narain Sinha, Advocate General for State of Bihar, (Mr. U. P. Singh, Advocate, with him), for Respondents.
Constitution of India,1950 - Article l9 (1) (f) - Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act 14 of 1950 - Section 11 (2) - Orissa Sales Tax Act - Section 14-A- Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Section 20-A - Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Section 20-A - Sales Tax - Sale of cement and other commodities - Sales Tax assessment - Assesses - returned for year under Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947, an amount as its turnover from sale of cement and other commodities - Superintendent of Sales Tax brought to tax an additional amount being railway freight paid in respect of goods supplied by assessee - By order dated Appellate Authority set aside order directing inclusion of railway freight in turnover, and ordered that assessment be revised - If prescribed authority has reason to believe that any dealer has or had, at any time, whether before or after commencement of this Act, collected any such amount, in a case in which or to an extent to which said dealer was or is not liable to pay such amount - Whether Section 20-A of Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 is within competence of State Legislature - Whether an order may tie made under Section 20-A for depositing with State Government an amount collected by a registered dealer from his constituent to recoup himself for payment of sales-tax – Held, In light of scheme of Act and various provisions made, it would be futile to expect that a purchaser would normally be able to enforce liability of State to pay amount collected by dealer and which is deposited or deemed to be deposited with Government - Period of limitation does not commence to run from the date on which the money is deposited or deemed to be deposited into Government treasury but from date on which purchaser may be entitled to file a suit against dealer in a civil Court - State is in law under no obligation to hold the amount as trustee for the purchaser - Amount to be recovered or appropriated remains part of Consolidated Fund of State and becomes property of State - As already pointed out, this Court in the judgment in Abdul Quader s case, (1964) 6 SCR 867 has clearly held that State has no power to legislate for recovering amount which is collected by taxpayer in order to recoup himself for payment of tax which under law he is not bound to pay - Appeal allowed.
Judgment
SHAH, J.:- Ashoka Marketing Ltd.-hereinafter called the assesses -returned for the year 1956-57 under the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947, an amount of Rs. 2,46 67,517-1-6 as its turnover from sale of cement and other commodities. The Superintendent of Sales Tax brought to tax an additional amount of Rs. 7,67,702-13-0 being the railway freight paid in respect of the goods supplied by the assessee. By order dated April 2, 1961 the Appellate Authority set aside the order directing inclusion of the railway freight in the turnover, and ordered that the assessment be revised.
2. In the meantime the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947, was repealed and was replaced by the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 19 of 1959. By Act 20 of 1962, Section 20-A was introduced in the Bihar Sales Tax Act 19 of 1959. The relevant provisions of Section 20-A were:
"(1) No person who is not a registered dealer shall collect from any person any amount, by whatever name or description it may be called, towards or purporting to be tax on sale of goods.
(2) No registered dealer shall collect from any person any such amount, except in a case in which and to the extent to which such dealer is liable to pay tax under this Act.
(3) (a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law or contract or any judgment, decree or order of any Tribunal, Court or authority, if the prescribed authority has reason to believe that any dealer has or had, at any time, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, collected any such amount, in a case in which or to an extent to which the said dealer was or is not liable to pay such amount, it shall serve on such dealer a notice in the prescribed manner requiring him on a date and at a time and place to be specified therein either to attend in person or through authorised representative to show cause why he should not deposit into the Government treasury the amount so collected by him.
(b) On the day specified in the notice under Clause (a) or as soon thereafter as may be, the prescribed authority may, after giving the dealer or his authorised representative a reasonable opportunity of being heard and examining such accounts and other evidence as may be produced by or on behalf of the dealer and making such further enquiry as it may deem necessary, order that the dealer shall deposit forthwith into the Government treasury, the amount found to have been so collected by the dealer and not refunded prior to the receipt of the notice aforesaid to the person from whom it had been collected.
"(4) Where any amount so collected by the dealer and deposited by him into the Government treasury has already been refunded to the dealer in pursuance of or as a result of any judgment, decree or order of any Tribunal, Court or authority, but the dealer has not refunded the amount to the person from whom he had collected it, the prescribed authority shall, notwithstanding such refund to the dealer, proceed to take action in accordance with the provisions of subsection (3) for securing deposit of such amount.
(5) Where any such amount has not been refunded to the dealer before the commencement of this Act but a refund has been directed by a Court, Tribunal or authority, the amount shall notwithstanding such direction, be deemed to be a deposit made in pursuance of an order under sub-section (3).
(6) x x x x
(7) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any law or contract, when any amount is deposited by a dealer in compliance with an order under sub-section (3) or sub-section (4) or is deemed, under sub-section (5), to have been so deposited, such deposit shall constitute a good and complete discharge of the liability of the dealer in respect of such amount to the person from whom it was collected.
(8) The person from whom the dealer has collected the amount deposited in pursuance of an order under sub-section (3) or sub-section (4) or deemed, under sub-section (5), to have been so deposited shall be entitled to apply to the prescribed authority in
applied : R. Abdul Quader and Co. v. Sales Tax Officer, Hydrabad
distinguished : The Orient Paper Mills Ltd. v. Staff of orissa and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.