SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 186

A.N.RAY, C.A.VAIDIALINGAM
Percy Rustomji Basta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

VAIDIALINGAM, J. - This appeal by the first accused, on certificate, is directed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated September 26, 1968, in Criminal Appeal No, 244 of 1967 confirming his conviction and sentence passed against him by the Presidency, Magistrate Mazgaon, Bombay for offences under S. 120-B, Indian Penal Code read with Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 (Act 52 of 19621 hereinafter to be referred as the Act) and also under Section 135 of the Customs Act in respect of the articles claimed to have been recovered from his possession.

2. The short point that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether Section 24 of the Evidence Act is a bar to the admissibility in evidence of the statement Ex. T. given by the appellant to the Customs Officers on a summons issued to him under Section 108 of the Act.

3. The appellant along with six others was charged under the sections mentioned above and after being found guilty was sentenced to undergo one years s rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- for the charges under Section 120-B Indian Penal Code read with Section 135 of the Act. He was also sentenced to undergo one year s rigorous imp









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top